Search Results for "service tax recovery"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "service tax recovery"

1157 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1157 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging SARFAESI Sale Notice by Cooperative Bank — Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 Available. Cooperative Bank is a 'Bank' Under Section 2(c) of SARFAESI Act, 2002, and Can Initiate Proceedings Under the Act.

7 Aug 2023

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Sri N Ravindranath Kamath and another petitioner challenging the sale notice dated 19.01.2021 iss...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Drug Price Control Demand Against Pharmaceutical Company. Cream Vs. Ointment Distinction and Small Scale Industry Exemption Under DPCO 1995 Considered.

23 Dec 2016

The writ petition arose from a dispute concerning the drug price control regime under the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1995 (DPCO 1995). The first pet...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Overrules HUDA v. Sunita, Holds Statutory Bodies Amenable to Consumer Protection Act for Services Rendered for Consideration. The Court ruled that the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 applies to statutory authorities providing services for consideration, and sovereign functions are exempt only if strictly understood.

16 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court considered a reference arising from an order dated 13.07.2018, where a two-judge Bench doubted the correctness of HUDA v. Sunita (20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Section 14 SARFAESI Act Order for Police Aid — No Locus Standi for Borrower's Partner After Property Sold to Third Party. The Court held that once the secured asset is sold and possession handed over to the auction purchaser, the borrower or its partner has no right to challenge the Section 14 order, and the remedy lies before the DRT under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.

9 Oct 2015

The petitioners, M/s. National Laminate Corporation (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Jayantilal L. Nisar, filed a writ petition under Article ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Second Appeals in RERA Delayed Possession Matter. Builder Challenges Appellate Tribunal's Direction to Pay Interest at 10.05% p.a. from February 2014.

8 Jun 2026

These Second Appeals were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay by Runwal Constructions, a registered partnership firm, challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Certificate Under Section 101 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 Due to Delay and Laches. Auction proceedings conducted after 8 years of certificate issuance upheld as petitioner failed to challenge earlier orders.

22 Jul 2022

The petitioner filed a Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a Certificate issued under Section 101 of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging Waqf Board Notice on Land Exchange — Exchange of Waqf Property Allegedly Without Required Sanction Under Section 32(2)(j) of Waqf Act, 1995. Court Examines Whether Notice Was Final Decision or Show-Cause, and Whether Exchange Valid Despite Internal Board Procedural Issues.

9 Oct 2017

The petitioners, a partnership firm and its partner, challenged a notice issued by the Chief Executive Officer of the Maharashtra State Board of Waqfs...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Secured Creditors in SARFAESI Act Case — Holds Chief Judicial Magistrate Competent Under Section 14. The Court resolved the conflict among High Courts by interpreting that the CJM can exercise powers under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, for taking possession of secured assets in non-metropolitan areas.

23 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court resolved a conflict among High Courts regarding the interpretation of Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financi...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Valuation Case — Confirms CESTAT's Finding That Transaction Value of Imported Goods Is Acceptable Under Section 14 of Customs Act, 1962. Burden of Proof on Revenue to Show Fraud or Misdeclaration Not Discharged.

29 Apr 2026

The case involves four Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs (Port-Export), Chennai, under Section 130 of the Customs Act, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Admission of Winding-Up Petition Against Telecom Company Due to Substratum Erosion and Deadlock. Cancellation of 2G Licences and Irreconcilable Differences Between Equal Shareholders Justify Winding-Up Under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956.

8 Apr 2014

The appeal arose from an order of the company judge admitting a petition for winding up of Etisalat D.B. Telecom Limited (the company) under Section 4...

55 56 57 58 59

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)