High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging SARFAESI Sale Notice by Cooperative Bank — Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 Available. Cooperative Bank is a 'Bank' Under Section 2(c) of SARFAESI Act, 2002, and Can Initiate Proceedings Under the Act.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 105
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Sri N Ravindranath Kamath and another petitioner challenging the sale notice dated 19.01.2021 issued by the Authorised Officer of Sri Subramanyeshwara Cooperative Bank Limited under Rule 8(6) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, for recovery of dues. The petitioners sought quashing of the sale notice and a direction to the bank not to auction the scheduled property. The primary legal issue was whether a cooperative bank is a 'bank' under Section 2(c) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) and can initiate proceedings under the SARFAESI Act. The petitioners argued that the cooperative bank is not a 'bank' under the SARFAESI Act and that the proceedings under the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959, should apply. The respondents contended that the cooperative bank is a 'bank' under Section 2(c) of the SARFAESI Act, as it is a 'cooperative bank' as defined in Section 5(cci) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, and that the SARFAESI Act prevails over the state Act. The court analyzed the definition of 'bank' under Section 2(c) of the SARFAESI Act, which includes a 'cooperative bank' as defined in the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. The court held that the cooperative bank is indeed a 'bank' under the SARFAESI Act and can enforce security interest under the Act. The court further held that the writ petitions are not maintainable as the petitioners have an efficacious alternative remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. The court found no jurisdictional error or violation of principles of natural justice to justify interference under Article 226. Consequently, both writ petitions were dismissed.

Headnote

A) Banking Law - SARFAESI Act - Cooperative Bank - Section 2(c) of SARFAESI Act, 2002 - A cooperative bank is a 'bank' under Section 2(c) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, as it is a 'cooperative bank' as defined in Section 5(cci) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, and is included in the definition of 'bank' under Section 2(c) of the SARFAESI Act. The court held that the SARFAESI Act applies to cooperative banks and they can enforce security interest under the Act. (Paras 5-8)

B) Banking Law - SARFAESI Act - Alternative Remedy - Section 17 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 - A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a sale notice under the SARFAESI Act is not maintainable when the petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. The court held that the petitioners failed to demonstrate any jurisdictional error or violation of principles of natural justice to bypass the statutory remedy. (Paras 9-11)

C) Banking Law - SARFAESI Act - Sale Notice - Rule 8(6) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 - The sale notice dated 19.01.2021 issued by the Authorised Officer under Rule 8(6) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, was not shown to suffer from any jurisdictional error or illegality. The court held that the petitioners' challenge to the sale notice on merits cannot be entertained in writ jurisdiction. (Paras 12-13)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a cooperative bank is a 'bank' under Section 2(c) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) and can initiate proceedings under the SARFAESI Act; Whether the writ petitions challenging the sale notice under the SARFAESI Act are maintainable in view of the alternative remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both writ petitions are dismissed. The petitioners are at liberty to avail the alternative remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act before the Debts Recovery Tribunal.

Law Points

  • Cooperative Bank is a 'bank' under Section 2(c) of SARFAESI Act
  • 2002
  • SARFAESI Act prevails over Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act
  • 1959
  • Writ petition not maintainable when alternative remedy under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act is available
  • No jurisdictional error in sale notice under Rule 8(6) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

NC: 2023:KHC:27721

WP No. 3791 of 2021 (GM-RES) C/W WP No. 1 of 2023 (GM-RES)

2023-08-07

Justice Krishna S Dixit

NC: 2023:KHC:27721

Sri Diwakar K., Senior Counsel a/w Sri N Ravindranath Kamath (Party-in-Person) for petitioners; Smt Lakshmy Iyengar, Senior Counsel a/w Sri K S Venkataramana for respondent 3; Smt Shweta Krishnappa, AGA for respondent 6

Sri N Ravindranath Kamath (in WP 3791/2021); Sri N Ravindranath Kamath and Sri T.A. Rajashekar (in WP 1/2023)

Sri Subramanyeshwara Co-operative Bank Limited and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a sale notice issued under the SARFAESI Act by a cooperative bank.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of sale intimation/notice dated 19.01.2021 under Rule 8(6) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, and direction to the bank not to auction the petitioners' schedule mentioned property.

Filing Reason

The petitioners challenged the sale notice on the ground that the cooperative bank is not a 'bank' under the SARFAESI Act and that the proceedings under the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959, should apply.

Issues

Whether a cooperative bank is a 'bank' under Section 2(c) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and can initiate proceedings under the SARFAESI Act. Whether the writ petitions challenging the sale notice under the SARFAESI Act are maintainable in view of the alternative remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the cooperative bank is not a 'bank' under Section 2(c) of the SARFAESI Act and that the proceedings should be under the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959. Respondents argued that the cooperative bank is a 'bank' under Section 2(c) of the SARFAESI Act as it is a 'cooperative bank' under Section 5(cci) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, and that the SARFAESI Act prevails over the state Act.

Ratio Decidendi

A cooperative bank is a 'bank' under Section 2(c) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and can enforce security interest under the Act. A writ petition under Article 226 challenging a sale notice under the SARFAESI Act is not maintainable when an efficacious alternative remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act is available, unless there is a jurisdictional error or violation of principles of natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

A cooperative bank is a 'bank' under Section 2(c) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, as it is a 'cooperative bank' as defined in Section 5(cci) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. The writ petitions are not maintainable as the petitioners have an efficacious alternative remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act before the Debts Recovery Tribunal.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed two writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the sale notice dated 19.01.2021 issued by the Authorised Officer of the cooperative bank under Rule 8(6) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002. The petitions were heard together and dismissed by the High Court on 07.08.2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002: Section 2(c), Section 17
  • Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002: Rule 8(6)
  • Banking Regulation Act, 1949: Section 5(cci)
  • Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959:
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Allows Revision of GST TRAN-1 to Claim Transitional Credit Due to Technical Glitch. Petitioner permitted to file revised FORM GST TRAN-1 under Section 140(8) of CGST Act, 2017 to correct inadvertent error in transferring credit t...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging SARFAESI Sale Notice by Cooperative Bank — Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 Available. Cooperative Bank is a 'Bank' Under Section 2(c) of SARFAESI Act, 2002, and Can Initiate Proceedings Un...