Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Certificate Under Section 101 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 Due to Delay and Laches. Auction proceedings conducted after 8 years of certificate issuance upheld as petitioner failed to challenge earlier orders.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner filed a Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a Certificate issued under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 dated 03/05/2002. The petition was filed on 15/03/2010, i.e., after about 8 years from the date of the certificate. During this period, the Special Recovery Officer conducted auction proceedings under Rule 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules. The Court observed that the petitioner did not challenge the auction proceedings and failed to explain the inordinate delay. The Court held that the petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay and laches. The Court dismissed the petition, noting that the petitioner allowed the auction to proceed and cannot now challenge the certificate after such a long delay.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Delay and Laches - Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India - The petitioner challenged a certificate under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 after about 8 years, during which auction proceedings were conducted. The Court held that the petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay and laches as the petitioner failed to explain the inordinate delay and allowed the auction to proceed. (Paras 2-3)

B) Co-operative Societies - Recovery Certificate - Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - The certificate dated 03/05/2002 was challenged in 2010. The Court noted that the Special Recovery Officer conducted auction proceedings under Rule 101 in the interregnum, and the petitioner did not challenge those proceedings. The Court dismissed the petition, observing that the petitioner cannot be allowed to challenge the certificate after such delay. (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Writ Petition challenging the Certificate under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 dated 03/05/2002 is maintainable after a delay of about 8 years and in view of subsequent auction proceedings.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Misc. Civil Application No. 436/2022 is allowed. The Writ Petition No. 1262/2010 is dismissed on the ground of delay and laches.

Law Points

  • Delay and laches
  • Section 101 Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act
  • 1960
  • Auction proceedings
  • Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (07) 108

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 436/2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1262/2010

2022-07-22

Amit Borkar, J.

Shri V.S. Giramkar for Petitioner(s); Shri M.A. Kadu, AGP for Respondent/State; Shri V.R. Borkar for Respondent No. 2; Shri J.K. Matale for Respondent No. 3

Likhan S/o Urkudji Meshram (Dead) through legal representatives Lata wd/o Likhan Meshram, Mayur S/o Likhan Meshram, Kunal S/o Likhan Meshram, Rahul S/o Likhan Meshram

Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Amgaon; Chief Executive Officer, Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd., Gondia; Priya Girdhar Bohare; District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Gondia

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a Certificate under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought to challenge the Certificate dated 03/05/2002 issued under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

Filing Reason

The petitioner challenged the certificate on grounds not specified in the judgment, but the petition was dismissed due to delay and laches.

Previous Decisions

The Special Recovery Officer conducted Auction Proceedings under Rule 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules during the pendency of the petition.

Issues

Whether the Writ Petition challenging the Certificate under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 is maintainable after a delay of about 8 years? Whether the petitioner can challenge the certificate after auction proceedings have been conducted?

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued for challenging the certificate, but the judgment does not detail the arguments. The respondents likely argued that the petition is barred by delay and laches.

Ratio Decidendi

A writ petition challenging a certificate under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 filed after an inordinate delay of about 8 years, during which auction proceedings were conducted, is liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay and laches. The petitioner cannot be allowed to challenge the certificate after allowing the auction to proceed.

Judgment Excerpts

For the reasons stated in the Application, the Application is allowed. This is a Writ Petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the Certificate issued under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 dated 03/05/2002. In the interregnum, the Special Recovery Officer conducted the Auction Proceedings under Rule 101

Procedural History

The Certificate under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 was issued on 03/05/2002. The Writ Petition was filed on 15/03/2010. During the pendency of the petition, the Special Recovery Officer conducted auction proceedings under Rule 101. The Misc. Civil Application No. 436/2022 was filed and allowed on 22/07/2022, and the Writ Petition was dismissed on the same day.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960: 101
  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Divorce Appeal and Dismisses Husband's Restitution Appeal in Inter-Caste Marriage Case — Cruelty and Desertion Established. The court held that the husband's suspicious behavior and false accusations of infidelity co...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Initiates Suo Moto Contempt Proceedings Against Regional Manager for Disobeying Court Order in Motor Accident Claims. The court issued notice to the accused for willful disobedience of order dated 19.03.2015 in MFA Nos.10536/2...