Search Results for "interest under Section 30(4)"

769 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 769 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rash Driving Case — No Evidence of Negligence. Acquittal upheld as prosecution failed to prove rash or negligent driving under Sections 279, 304-A, 338 IPC and Section 184 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Mahadeo Siddhappa Ghali, a bus driver, by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Miraj. The a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Part in Dowry Death Appeal. Conviction under Section 306 IPC set aside due to lack of evidence of abetment, but conviction under Section 498A IPC upheld for cruelty.

The appellant, Somnath Yeshwant Shirsat, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik for offences under Sections 498A and 306 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Water Supply to Industries from Irrigation Dams — No Legal Right to Challenge Government Policy on Water Allocation. Court Held That Petitioners Failed to Establish Any Violation of Fundamental Rights or Statutory Provisions.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed as Public Interest Litigations (PILs) before the Bombay High Court. The first petitioner, Suresh Ram...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Prakash Shankar Mohite, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri, in Sessions Trial No. 61 of 2002 for the murder of h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Interest Demand on Customs Duty for Provisional Assessment Prior to Amendment. Interest under Section 28AA of Customs Act, 1962 cannot be levied retrospectively for period before its insertion when provisional assessment under Section 18 did not provide for interest.

The petitioner, M/s. R. K. Chemicals, a proprietorship firm, imported a consignment of Mono Sodium Glutamate in 1996. There was a dispute regarding th...