Search Results for "essential qualifications"

650 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 650 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Application in Service Matter — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to errors apparent on face of record; re-argument of merits not permitted.

The petitioner, Arun Bhaduji Bansod, filed a review application under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking review of an order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Disqualify Panchayat Member for Conflict of Interest Under Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 — Respondent Used Official Position to Obtain NOC for Spouse's Business, Violating Section 10(1)(h).

The petitioner, a resident and voter of Verla Canca village, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a declaration that re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Member for Having More Than Two Children Under Section 14(1)(j1) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Children from Both Marriages Counted Regardless of Divorce; Belated Application Does Not Bar Disqualification.

The petitioner, Ashok Balasaheb Chaugule, was elected as a member of the Gram Panchayat of Tardal, Taluka Hatkanangale, District Kolhapur in 2007. Res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Charge-Sheet in Insecticide Act Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Invalid Complaint. The court held that the complaint was not filed by a duly authorized Insecticide Inspector and no valid sanction was obtained under Section 31 of the Insecticide Act, 1968.

The applicant, Tajraj s/o Yadorav Chavhan, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of FIR No. 0244/2023...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Appointment of Public Prosecutor for Pune District Due to Non-Compliance with Section 24 CrPC. Appointment made without consulting the Advocate General and without considering eligible Additional Public Prosecutors violates statutory requirements.

The petitioner, Mrs. Neelima Sadanand Vartak, an Additional Public Prosecutor in Pune District since 1986, challenged the notification dated 1st June ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Lays Down Procedure for Adoption Petitions Under Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 to Prevent Malpractices in Relinquishment of Children. Court Formulates Comprehensive Scheme for Ascertaining Genuineness of Biological Parents, Unwed Mothers, and Child's Birth in Adoption Cases.

The Bombay High Court, while dealing with a petition under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 for appointment of guardian of a female minor named Rita,...