Bombay High Court Lays Down Procedure for Adoption Petitions Under Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 to Prevent Malpractices in Relinquishment of Children. Court Formulates Comprehensive Scheme for Ascertaining Genuineness of Biological Parents, Unwed Mothers, and Child's Birth in Adoption Cases.

High Court: Bombay High Court
  • 177
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Bombay High Court, while dealing with a petition under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 for appointment of guardian of a female minor named Rita, noted that the procedure for ascertaining the genuineness of biological parents/unwed mother, authenticity of relinquishment, and child's birth, and to prevent malpractices in relinquishment was required to be clearly spelt out. Accordingly, notices were issued to institutions such as Nirmala Niketan and Tata Institute of Social Sciences to evoke their response on related matters. Pursuant to the notices, they appeared through their representatives Dr. Mehta for Nirmala Niketan and Mrs. Asha Vajpayee for Tata Institute of Social Science. Besides them, Mr. Hariharan with Ms. Pranjali Ahire addressed the issue on behalf of I.C.S.W. Ms. Madhavi Diwan, Advocate also assisted the Court in formulating the Scheme on the said issues. Mr. Rajesh Kapoor, Advocate for the Petitioners and Mrs. Madhubala Kajale, A.G.P. including Ms. Vandana Krishna, the Secretary of Women and Children Development Department, State of Maharashtra, also contributed for formalising the procedure. The Court laid down a comprehensive procedure to be followed in such petitions to ensure genuineness and prevent malpractices.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Adoption - Procedure for Ascertaining Genuineness of Biological Parents/Unwed Mother - Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - The Court noted that the procedure for ascertaining the genuineness of biological parents/unwed mother, authenticity of relinquishment, and child's birth, and to prevent malpractices in relinquishment was required to be clearly spelt out. Notices were issued to institutions such as Nirmala Niketan and Tata Institute of Social Sciences to evoke their response on related matters. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

What procedure should be followed in petitions under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 for appointment of guardian of a minor to ensure genuineness of biological parents/unwed mother, authenticity of relinquishment, and child's birth, and to prevent malpractices in relinquishment?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court laid down a procedure for ascertaining the genuineness of biological parents/unwed mother, authenticity of relinquishment, and child's birth, and to prevent malpractices in relinquishment in petitions under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. The Court issued notices to institutions and formulated a scheme with the assistance of various representatives and advocates.

Law Points

  • Procedure for ascertaining genuineness of biological parents/unwed mother
  • authenticity of relinquishment
  • child's birth
  • prevention of malpractices in relinquishment
  • Guardians and Wards Act
  • 1890
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (08) 286

F.A. Petition No.26 of 2005

2005-08-31

A.M. Khanwilkar, J.

2005:BHC-OS:3462

Mr. Rakeshkapoor for Petitioners, Mr. O. Hariharan with Ms. Pranjali Ahire (Representatives of I.C.S.W.), Mrs. Madhubala Kajale (A.G.P. for State), Ms. Madhavi Diwan (Advocate), Ms. Vandana Krishna (Secretary, Woman & Children Development Department, Government of Maharashtra), Dr. Mehta (Representative of Nirmala Niketan), Mrs. Asha Vajpayee (Representative of Tata Institute of Social Science)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Petition under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 for appointment of guardian of a female minor named Rita.

Remedy Sought

Appointment of guardian of person of a female minor Rita.

Filing Reason

To obtain guardianship of a minor child, and the Court sought to lay down procedure to prevent malpractices in relinquishment.

Issues

What procedure should be followed in petitions under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 to ascertain genuineness of biological parents/unwed mother, authenticity of relinquishment, and child's birth, and to prevent malpractices in relinquishment?

Ratio Decidendi

The procedure for ascertaining the genuineness of biological parents/unwed mother, authenticity of relinquishment, and child's birth, and to prevent malpractices in relinquishment in petitions under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 must be clearly spelt out and followed.

Judgment Excerpts

While dealing with the present Petition, which is instituted under the provisions of Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, it was noted that generally the procedure for ascertaining the genuineness of biological parents/unwed mother, authenticity of relinquishment, authenticity and child's birth and to prevent mal-practices in relinquishment was required to be clearly spelt out. Accordingly, notices were issued to institutions such as Nirmala Niketan and Tata Institute of Social Sciences to evoke their response on related matters.

Procedural History

The petition was filed under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. The Court noted the need for a clear procedure and issued notices to institutions. Various representatives and advocates appeared and contributed to formalising the procedure.

Acts & Sections

  • Guardians and Wards Act, 1890:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Under Section 115 CPC Due to Alternate Remedy Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Order rejecting plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC affects substantive rights and is revisable under Section 34(4) of the MRC Ac...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Maharashtra Government's Promotion Procedure for Deputy Collectors as Violative of Article 16. Direct Recruit Quota and Division-wise Select Lists Struck Down as Denial of Equal Opportunity in Public Employment.