Search Results for "consent arbitral award"

931 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 931 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Extra Overhead Expenses in Railway Contract Dispute — Clause 17(3) Bars Damages for Delay. The court held that the Arbitral Tribunal's award of compensation for delay was contrary to the express terms of the contract and the mutual shortclosure agreement.

The case involves a challenge by the Union of India (Petitioner) against an arbitral award dated 20th February 2007 passed by an Arbitral Tribunal in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Section 34 Applications Under Arbitration Act from District Court to High Court for Consolidated Hearing. Transfer Ordered Under Section 24 CPC to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings and Conflicting Decisions in Arbitration Matters.

The applicant, Atlanta Limited, a public limited company, filed this application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking transfe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Amendment Application in Arbitration Challenge Due to Delay and Lack of Diligence. Petitioner Failed to Explain 17-Month Delay in Seeking to Add New Ground Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Petitioner, Zee Sports Limited (now Zee Digital Convergence Ltd.), filed a Chamber Summons seeking amendment to its Arbitration Petition under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Amendment Application in Arbitration Challenge Due to Delay and Lack of Diligence. Petitioner Failed to Show Justification for Incorporating New Ground 17 Months After Filing Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by Zee Sports Limited (now Zee Digital Convergence Ltd.) seeking amendment to its Arbitration Petition chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Pipeline Construction Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitrator's Findings of Fact and Reduces Interest Rate from 18% to 12% Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Mahanagar Gas Limited, awarded a work order to the respondent, M/s. Babulal Uttamchand & Co., for project management and construction o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Family Property Dispute. Arbitrator's findings on possession and tenancy rights upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Anil Sital Hansrajani and another, who are brothers and sons of the respondent Sital T. Hansrajani, filed a petition under Section 34...