Search Results for "arbitration and conciliation act 1996"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "arbitration and conciliation act 1996"

2288 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2288 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Cross-Appeals Against Remand Order in Arbitration Matter — Power of Appellate Court Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Examined. The Court held that an appellate court under Section 37 cannot remand a Section 34 petition for fresh hearing but must decide the appeal on merits.

8 Jul 2024

The dispute arose from a development agreement concerning a slum rehabilitation scheme in Mumbai. The appellant, Bombay Slum Redevelopment Corporation...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Appoints Sole Arbitrator for Micro Enterprise Against Central Railway Under MSMED Act, 2006. Conciliation Failed, Arbitration Agreement Exists, Court Appoints Retired Judge as Arbitrator Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Dec 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Microvision Technologies Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 and a micro enterprise under the Mi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside District Court's Order That Had Set Aside Arbitral Award on Grounds Beyond Section 34 Scope. The Court Held That Reappreciation of Evidence Is Not Permissible Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the District Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction.

21 Nov 2019

The appellant, M/s. Scigen Biopharma Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Arbitral Award Allowing Price Reduction Deductions by HPCL Against Pipeline Contractor. Arbitral Award Rejecting Claims of Rs.3.28 Crores for Alleged Delay in Pipeline Project Upheld as No Perversity Found in Interpretation of Price Reduction Clause.

24 Mar 2015

The dispute arose from a contract for laying pipelines and associated facilities for the Pune-Solapur Pipeline Project awarded by Hindustan Petroleum ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to ISP in Section 9 Arbitration Application, Restraining OTT Platform from Suspending Internet Services to 22,000+ Subscribers. Court holds that MOU creates binding obligations and balance of convenience favors continuity of services pending arbitration.

2 Dec 2022

The applicant, World Phone Internet Services Pvt. Ltd. (WPISPL), a Delhi-based Class A Unified License ISP, filed an application under Section 9 of th...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Cross Appeals Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Against Single Judge's Order in Arbitration Petition. Appeals Arise from Setting Aside of Arbitral Award on Multiple Claims Relating to Pipeline Contract, Raising Issues of Judicial Review Under Section 34 and Finality of Engineer-in-Charge Decisions.

8 Aug 2025

These were cross appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay against the orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Civil Revision Application in Partnership Dispute - Arbitration Clause Survives Dissolution. Dispute regarding dissolution of partnership and rendition of accounts is arbitrable under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

28 Apr 2021

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the defendant (applicant) challenging an order of the City Civil Court, Greater Bombay, which ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

22 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Ramakrishnan Krishnan, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petitions Challenging Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Property Dispute. Court holds that appointment of arbitrator by consent of parties is valid and cannot be challenged under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Jul 2015

The judgment pertains to two arbitration petitions filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioners in Arbitratio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Unconditional Stay of Arbitral Award in Favour of State Government. Order XXVII Rule 8A CPC Does Not Mandate Unconditional Stay; Court Must Impose Conditions Under Section 36(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

12 Jul 2019

The case arises from a dispute between PAM Developments Private Ltd. (appellant) and the State of West Bengal (respondent) concerning a tender for roa...

55 56 57 58 59

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)