Bombay High Court Allows Civil Revision Application in Partnership Dispute - Arbitration Clause Survives Dissolution. Dispute regarding dissolution of partnership and rendition of accounts is arbitrable under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the defendant (applicant) challenging an order of the City Civil Court, Greater Bombay, which dismissed his notice of motion seeking reference of the dispute to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The plaintiff (respondent) had filed a suit for dissolution of the partnership firm and rendition of accounts. The partnership deed dated 05/08/2014 contained an arbitration clause (clause 19). The trial court dismissed the motion on three grounds: (i) the partnership was at will and a partner's right to dissolve cannot be taken away by arbitration; (ii) the arbitration clause ceases to apply after dissolution; and (iii) the dispute did not fall within the scope of the arbitration clause, which was limited to interpretation of terms or conduct of business. The defendant argued that the arbitration clause survives dissolution and covers all disputes relating to the partnership, relying on Branch Manager Magma Leasing and Finance Limited v. Potluri Madhavilala. The High Court analyzed the arbitration clause and found it broad enough to cover disputes regarding dissolution and accounts. It held that the arbitration clause does not become inoperative upon dissolution and that a partner cannot avoid arbitration by dissolving the firm. The court set aside the trial court's order and allowed the revision application, directing the parties to arbitration.

Headnote

A) Arbitration Law - Survival of Arbitration Clause - Dissolution of Partnership - Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - The arbitration clause in a partnership deed does not become inoperative upon dissolution of the firm; it survives for resolution of disputes arising out of or in relation to the partnership. The court held that the arbitration clause covers disputes regarding dissolution and rendition of accounts, and the trial court erred in dismissing the application under Section 8. (Paras 6-10)

B) Partnership Law - Partnership at Will - Right to Dissolve - Arbitration - Section 43 of Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - The right of a partner to dissolve a partnership at will does not preclude the parties from agreeing to refer disputes to arbitration. The arbitration clause is a contractual obligation that must be honoured, and a partner cannot unilaterally avoid arbitration by dissolving the firm. (Paras 5, 10)

C) Civil Procedure Code - Revision - Section 115 CPC - Interference with Interlocutory Order - The High Court in revision under Section 115 CPC can interfere if the trial court has exercised jurisdiction not vested in it or has failed to exercise jurisdiction vested in it. The trial court's order dismissing the application under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act was set aside as it erroneously held that the dispute was not arbitrable. (Paras 2, 10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the dispute regarding dissolution of partnership and rendition of accounts is covered by the arbitration clause in the Partnership Deed and whether the arbitration clause survives dissolution of the partnership firm.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the civil revision application, set aside the trial court's order dated 21/08/2019, and directed the parties to refer the dispute to arbitration in accordance with clause 19 of the Partnership Deed.

Law Points

  • Arbitration clause survives dissolution of partnership
  • Partnership at will does not bar arbitration
  • Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • 1996
  • Section 115 of CPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (04) 41

Civil Revision Application No.83 of 2020

2021-04-28

Smt. Anuja Prabhudessai

Mr. Vishal Kanade with Mr. Jimish Shah i/b. Divya Shah Associates for the Applicant, Mr. Vimal Sanghvi for Respondent

Ankit Vijaykumar Khandelwal

Aarti Rajkumar Khandelwal

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil revision application challenging dismissal of notice of motion seeking reference to arbitration in a suit for dissolution of partnership and rendition of accounts.

Remedy Sought

The applicant (defendant) sought to refer the dispute to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Filing Reason

The trial court dismissed the notice of motion on grounds that the arbitration clause did not cover the dispute and ceased to apply after dissolution.

Previous Decisions

The trial court (City Civil Court, Greater Bombay) dismissed Notice of Motion No.2094 of 2017 on 21/08/2019.

Issues

Whether the dispute regarding dissolution of partnership and rendition of accounts is covered by the arbitration clause in the Partnership Deed. Whether the arbitration clause survives dissolution of the partnership firm.

Submissions/Arguments

Defendant argued that the arbitration clause is broad and covers all disputes relating to the partnership, and that it survives dissolution as per Branch Manager Magma Leasing case. Plaintiff contended that the dispute is not covered by clause 19, which is limited to interpretation of terms or conduct of business, and that the partnership at will cannot be forced into arbitration.

Ratio Decidendi

An arbitration clause in a partnership deed survives the dissolution of the firm and covers disputes relating to dissolution and rendition of accounts. A partner cannot avoid arbitration by dissolving a partnership at will, as the arbitration clause is a contractual obligation that must be honoured.

Judgment Excerpts

The arbitration clause does not become inoperative with dissolution of partnership or by termination of the contract. Clause 19 of the Partnership Deed is not restricted to two contingencies noted by the Trial Court but covers all disputes between the parties in respect of or in relation to the partnership business or in respect of interpretation, operation or enforcement of any of the terms and conditions of the Partnership Deed.

Procedural History

The plaintiff filed a suit for dissolution of partnership and rendition of accounts. The defendant filed Notice of Motion No.2094 of 2017 under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking reference to arbitration. The trial court dismissed the motion on 21/08/2019. The defendant filed Civil Revision Application No.83 of 2020 before the Bombay High Court, which was allowed on 28/04/2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 8
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 115
  • Indian Partnership Act, 1932: Section 43
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Employee Seeking Reinstatement Beyond Age 60 — Employee Not Covered Under BIR Act as He Was Not an 'Employee' Under Section 3(13).
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Civil Revision Application in Partnership Dispute - Arbitration Clause Survives Dissolution. Dispute regarding dissolution of partnership and rendition of accounts is arbitrable under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Concilia...