Search Results for "Statutory Tenancy"

1021 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1021 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case. Court holds that market value must reflect potential use and comparable sales, and that the Land Acquisition Officer's award is not binding on the Reference Court.

The judgment pertains to two first appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings for the benefit of the Goa Industrial Development Corporation. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenants' Petition Against Demolition of Cessed Building Without Compliance with Section 354 of MMC Act and DCR 33(7) — Held that Municipal Corporation must follow statutory procedure before demolition of dilapidated buildings.

The petitioners, tenants residing in a cessed building known as Martand Prasad Building in Malad (West), Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction Under Section 354A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act. Tenant Failed to Prove Permission for Construction and Suit Was Barred by Lack of Statutory Notice Under Section 527 of BMC Act.

The appellant, Shivashankar Swami, filed a suit in the Bombay City Civil Court challenging a notice dated 5 July 1999 issued under Section 354A of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Decision on Limitation in Insolvency Petition Initiated by Financial Creditor. Application Under Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Held Within Limitation After Excluding Time Spent in SARFAESI Proceedings Under Section 14(2) of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissing an appeal against an order of the National Company ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Ruling That Time Limit Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act is Directory. The provision requiring District Magistrate to pass possession order within 30 days (extendable to 60 days) is directory, as non-compliance does not invalidate proceedings or prejudice the borrower.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that the time limit under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Dishonour of Cheque for Investment in Business Partnership Attracts Section 138 NI Act Liability Despite Dispute Over Debt Legality.

The appellant, Sheikh Shabbir, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Vasco-da-Gama, acquitting the res...