Search Results for "Seized articles"

2641 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2641 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Four Accused for Murder Under Section 302 IPC in Black Magic Motive Case — Common Intention Established Through Eyewitness Testimony and Recovery of Weapon.

The case involves an appeal by four accused persons against their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive of Suspicion of Character. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder of his sister with axe due to suspicion about her character.

The appellant, Pramod @ Pintya s/o Bhaurao Bodkhe, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Darwha, District Yavatmal, in Sessions Trial No.10/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Part, Converts Murder Conviction to Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder in Property Dispute Assault. Single Axe Blow on Head Without Premeditation or Intention to Kill Reduces Offence from Section 302 IPC to Part I of Section 304 IPC.

The case arises from a property dispute between two brothers, Ramesh (appellant no.1) and Gajanan (deceased), who lived adjacent to each other. On 9 J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence and Failure to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction for Murder of Wife Based on Confession and Circumstantial Evidence Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Complete Chain of Circumstances.

The appellant, Mahavir Raghunathrao Hulungare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, for the murder of his wife Lata under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Part, Converts Murder Conviction to Culpable Homicide in Single Blow Case. Single knife blow inflicted during sudden quarrel without premeditation does not attract murder under Section 302 IPC but falls under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.

The appellant, Hansraj Ishwar Parekar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Sections 307 and 302 of the Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Premeditation. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Incident Occurred During Sudden Quarrel Without Premeditation, Attracting Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.

The appellant, Sanjay Tarasingh Thakur, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No. 631 of 2010 for offences under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to three appeals arising from a sessions case where two accused (Anand Roopchand Gajbhiye and Sandeep Namdeo Nimhan) were convic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Mother in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistent Testimonies. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for killing husband and daughter set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Smt. Kusum Sagun Malmanke, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, for the murder of her husband Sagun Tatoba Malmanke ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for killing his wife Sarita, relying on motive, last seen together, and recovery of bloodstained articles.

The appellant, Janardan Saju Patil, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg, for the murder of his wife Sarita under Section 302 IPC and sente...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Wildlife Protection Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Sections 39 and 40 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of animal articles beyond reasonable doubt.

The petitioner, Boraiah @ Boregowda @ Papanna, was originally acquitted by the trial court (Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.) & JMFC, Gundlupet) in C.C.No.494/200...