Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive of Suspicion of Character. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder of his sister with axe due to suspicion about her character.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Pramod @ Pintya s/o Bhaurao Bodkhe, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Darwha, District Yavatmal, in Sessions Trial No.10/2018 for the murder of his sister Seema under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine of Rs.3000. The prosecution case was that on 28.01.2018, the complainant Suraj Janardhan Pawar, brother of the deceased, received a phone call from Sanjay Thakare informing him that the appellant had assaulted Seema with an axe. The appellant had a motive due to suspicion about Seema's character, alleging illicit relations with Bharat Chavan. The appellant was last seen with the deceased, and the axe used in the crime was recovered at his instance. Medical evidence confirmed that death was due to head injury. The appellant challenged the conviction on the ground that the evidence was insufficient and that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The High Court, after examining the evidence, held that the chain of circumstances was complete and consistent with the guilt of the accused. The court found that the motive, last seen evidence, recovery of the weapon, and medical evidence all pointed to the appellant's guilt. The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction was upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Circumstantial Evidence - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Conviction based on motive, last seen, recovery of weapon, and medical evidence - The appellant was convicted for murdering his sister with an axe due to suspicion about her character. The court held that the chain of circumstances was complete and consistent with the guilt of the accused, and the conviction was upheld. (Paras 2-31)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 based on circumstantial evidence is sustainable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentence passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Darwha, District Yavatmal in Sessions Trial No.10/2018 dated 17.12.2019 is upheld.

Law Points

  • Circumstantial evidence
  • motive
  • last seen theory
  • recovery of weapon
  • medical evidence
  • Section 302 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (09) 219

Criminal Appeal No.88/2020

2025-09-16

Anil L. Pansare, Siddheshwar S. Thombre

2025:BHC-NAG:9083-DB

Shri N.K. Bhangade, Advocate instructed by Shri A.K. Bhangde, Advocate for appellant; Ms R.V. Sharma, APP for respondent/State

Pramod @ Pintya s/o Bhaurao Bodkhe

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Section 302 IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for murder of his sister Seema with an axe

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant on 17.12.2019 in Sessions Trial No.10/2018

Issues

Whether the conviction based on circumstantial evidence is sustainable

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the evidence was insufficient and the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Respondent/State argued that the chain of circumstances was complete and consistent with the guilt of the accused.

Ratio Decidendi

In a case based on circumstantial evidence, the chain of circumstances must be complete and consistent with the guilt of the accused, and the conviction can be upheld if motive, last seen, recovery of weapon, and medical evidence are proved.

Judgment Excerpts

The present appeal is filed against the judgment and order of conviction passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Darwha, District Yavatmal, in Sessions Trial No.10/2018 dated 17.12.2019, whereby the appellant/accused is convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.3000/-, in default, to suffer imprisonment for one year.

Procedural History

On 28.01.2018, complaint was filed. FIR No.56/2018 registered under Section 302 IPC. Investigation conducted, chargesheet submitted, case committed to Sessions Court. Trial resulted in conviction on 17.12.2019. Appeal filed on 2020-01-??. Judgment reserved on 08.09.2025 and pronounced on 16.09.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive of Suspicion of Character. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder of his sister with axe due to suspicion about her character.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Court's Interim Order Directing Employees to Deposit VRS Amount in Dispute Over Difference in Scheme Benefits. Held That Once VRS Is Accepted and Dispute Is Only About Differential Amount, Interim Direction to Dep...