Search Results for "managing partner"

610 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 610 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Decree in Suit for Want of Written Statement. Rule 89 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules Allows Judgment Without Separate Notice of Motion Where Written Statement Not Filed Within Time.

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by the 1st defendant (Aviation Travels Pvt Ltd) seeking to set aside an ex parte order dated 7th October 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Director in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Non-executive director cannot be held liable under Section 34 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 without specific averments of being in charge of business.

The applicant, Devendra Vinaykant Sheth, was original accused No. 7 in R.C.C. No. 686 of 2004 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmednagar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal Against Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Exparte Decree Case. Court Holds That Liberal Approach Is Required When Delay Is Not Due to Wilful Neglect and Sufficient Cause Is Shown.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by Pushkaraj Wagh (appellant/original defendant) against an exparte decree passed in Spl. Civil Suit No. 22/20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Companies Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside for Non-Prosecution of Director. Section 452 of Companies Act, 2013 requires that a director must be prosecuted for the company's default; acquittal of director without trial on merits is illegal.

The appellant, M/s. P.M. Granites Exports Pvt. Ltd., filed a complaint under Section 452 of the Companies Act, 2013 against the respondent, T. Manohar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Show-Cause Notice Under Customs Act — No Interference at Pre-Adjudication Stage. Section 28(11) of Customs Act, 1962 Upheld as Valid and Compensatory in Nature.

The petitioner, M/s. Royaloak Furniture India LLP, a furniture importer, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Against Entertainment Tax Imposition on Fashion Week Event. Petitioner failed to avail alternative remedy and did not cooperate with assessment proceedings under Karnataka Entertainment Tax Act, 1958.

The petitioner, M/s. Dream Merchants Events and Entertainment Groups, organized a 'Bangalore Fashion Week' event on 03.02.2012 at Hotel Crown Plaza. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Money Laundering Case Under PML Act. Petitioner, a first-time offender with no criminal antecedents, granted bail subject to stringent conditions including bond, surrender of passport, and weekly reporting to ED.

The petitioner, Shri S.C. Jayachandra, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail in Case...