Karnataka High Court Heard Combined Writ Petitions Challenging Inclusion in Police Rowdy Sheets. Petitioners Sought Quashing of Rowdy Sheets and Related Endorsements Under Standing Order 1059 of Karnataka Police Manual.
22 Apr 2022...
Search Results for "federal purpose"
607 result(s) found
Found 607 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petition for De-freezing of Bank Account in Alleged Crypto Currency Fraud Case. Petitioner Claims Innocence and Non-Compliance with Section 102 Cr.P.C.
6 Aug 2024The petitioner, a businessman engaged in oil trading, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section ...
- 19
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 37 Appeals, Upholding Arbitral Award Against Project Owner in Construction Dispute. Project Owner Bound by Arbitration Clause Though Non-Signatory, Owing to Active Participation and Common Intention Under Cox and Kings Principle.
3 Nov 2025The Bombay High Court considered three appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arising from a construction contract dis...
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Interim Motions in Suit by Foreign Trustees for Recovery of Assets Allegedly Concealed in India. The Court Examines Whether Plaintiffs Have Made Out Prima Facie Case for Disclosure and Deposit Orders Based on US Bankruptcy Court Findings.
8 Dec 2005The suit was filed by ITC Ltd., acting as trustees in bankruptcy of Suresh Chitalia, Devang Chitalia, EST Fibres Inc., and Lokman Establishment, to re...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 37 Appeal Against Partial Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Non-Signatory Principal Held Liable Based on Agency Relationship and Implied Consent.
3 Nov 2025The appeals arose from three arbitral awards passed in disputes relating to the construction of mustard seed processing and storage silos in Rajasthan...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Remands Kerala Luxury Tax on Tobacco Case to High Court for Determination of Trade Restriction Under Article 301. High Court Must First Find Infringement of Article 301 Before Considering Article 304(b) Saving, Clarifying Kalyani Stores Decision.
30 Jul 1969The case involved a challenge to the Kerala Luxury Tax on Tobacco (Validation) Act, 1964, enacted after the Supreme Court invalidated earlier rules fo...
- 21
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against Company and Managing Director for Foreign Exchange Violations. Complaint Invalid as Director of Enforcement Failed to Comply with Proviso to Section 23D(1) of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act Requiring Finding that Penalty in Adjudication Proceedings Would be Inadequate; Prosecution Under Rule 132A Also Incompetent After Rule Was Omitted.
23 Jul 1969The Rayala Corporation Pvt. Ltd. and its Managing Director, M.R. Pratap, appealed against a Madras High Court order that had dismissed their applicati...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Quashing Notification Declaring Gram Panchayat as Municipal Board - Constitutional Validity of State Notification Under Article 243Q Upheld. The Court held that Article 243Q of the Constitution does not mandate a separate notification by the Governor for specifying a transitional area, and the State's notification under Section 5 of the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 2009, issued on behalf of the Governor, is sufficient and valid.
10 Mar 2022The appeal arose from an order of the High Court of Judicature of Rajasthan dated 28.4.2015, which set aside a notification dated 12.8.2014 declaring ...
- 268
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Telangana Act Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Stale Material. Detenu Granted Bail Months Before Detention Order, Conditions Fulfilled, No Breach of Public Order Established.
25 Jan 2022The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the preventive detention of the detenu under the Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1986. ...
- 169
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decision Allowing Rectification of GST Returns in Error Period. The Court affirmed that circulars restricting rectification of Form GSTR-3B to net basis adjustments are inconsistent with GST laws and that rectification must be permitted in the period of error occurrence under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
28 Oct 2021The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Delhi dated 05.05.2020 in W.P. (C) No. 6345 of 2018, which allowed a writ petition filed by Bhar...
- 478
