Karnataka High Court Heard Combined Writ Petitions Challenging Inclusion in Police Rowdy Sheets. Petitioners Sought Quashing of Rowdy Sheets and Related Endorsements Under Standing Order 1059 of Karnataka Police Manual.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 99
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010354812020_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (KAR) (04) 16

Writ Petition No. 4504 of 2021 (GM-POLICE) clubbed with W.P. Nos. 6136/2017, 29117/2019, 14359/2020, 14399/2020, 8564/2021, 9116/2021, 13998/2021, 13999/2021, 14003/2021, 14022/2021, 14566/2021, 15696/2021, 15708/2021, 15756/2021, 15802/2021, 17538/2021, 18632/2021, 19880/2021, 23902/2021

2022-04-22

Krishna S. Dixit

Sarat Chandra Bijai, Sandesh J Chouta, Sandeep Lahari, Sharmila Shetty, Prasanna Kumar P, Rajendra V G, M T Nanaiah, S Balakrishnan, Harish K A, Samarth Prakash, Vinod Kumar M (AGA), Sridhar Prabhu (Amicus Curiae)

B.S. Prakash & Others

State of Karnataka & Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging inclusion of petitioners' names in police rowdy sheets and seeking quashing of related endorsements/orders.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of communications/endorsements and directions to remove their names from the rowdy lists/registers.

Filing Reason

Alleged illegal inclusion of names in rowdy sheets maintained by police stations, affecting their reputation and rights.

Previous Decisions

Impugned orders/endorsements were passed by police authorities continuing the rowdy sheet entries.

Procedural History

Multiple writ petitions were filed between 2017 and 2021 challenging police rowdy sheets; they were clubbed for common hearing by the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
  • Karnataka Police Manual: Standing Order 1059
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petition Under Article 226 Challenging Approval for Stream Alignment Change – Final Decision Not Included in Text. Petitioners Allege That Approvals for Straightening of Ambil Odha Were Granted Arbitrarily Without Fo...
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Disposes Writ Petition Directing Transport Corporation to Pay Surrender Leave Encashment with Interest. Mandamus Issued to Enforce Retired Employee's Right to Terminal Benefits.