Search Results for "directory rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "directory rules"

570 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 570 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Withdrawal of Writ Petition Challenging Promotion Notification After Subsequent Recommendation for Promotion. Petitioner's case for promotion from attendant to Clerk-cum-Data Entry Operator was recommended by the Grama Panchayat, rendering the petition infructuous.

14 Nov 2024

The petitioner, Sri Ashwith Kumar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Striking Off Written Statements in Commercial Suit — Time Limit of 120 Days Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC and Section 16 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended.

28 Apr 2026

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed by defendants in a commercial suit instituted by Tata Steel Ltd. (respondent) for recovery of amount...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Arbitration Application Under SARFAESI Act Between Secured Creditor and Prospective Secured Creditor Over Title Documents Dispute. The court held that a dispute between a secured creditor and an entity prevented from becoming a secured creditor due to refusal to hand over title documents is arbitrable under Section 11 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.

6 May 2026

The case involves a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Aditya Birla Housing Finance Limited (Applicant)...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes 10% Interim Compensation Order Under Section 143A of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Petitioner Not a Drawer of Cheque. Section 143A applies only to drawer of cheque, not to accused who is not drawer.

1 Jun 2022

The petitioner, V. Krishnamurthy, proprietor of Raghvenk Industries, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Medical Negligence Case — Quashes Criminal Proceedings Due to Lack of Proximate Causal Link Between Doctor's Act and Patient's Death. Section 304A IPC requires direct causation; mere delay in attending to patient after surgery does not constitute rash or negligent act amounting to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

1 Jan 2026

The appellant, Dr. Supriya Kumari, a senior anaesthetist at Dhanalakshmi Hospital, Kannur, was charged under Section 304A of the Indian Penal Code (IP...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Removal of Registrar (Evaluation) — Statutory Consultation Mandatory Under Section 14(3) of Karnataka State Universities Act, 2000. Removal Order Quashed for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Consultation Requirement, Petitioner Reinstated with Consequential Benefits.

13 Aug 2020

The petitioner, Dr. K. Janardhanam, a professor with 32 years of service and a member of the Scheduled Caste, was appointed as Registrar (Evaluation) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal Against CESTAT Order Setting Aside Penalty and Confiscation. Import of Vessels for Offshore Exploration Not Liable to Penalty Under Customs Act for Alleged Misdeclaration of Value.

13 Jul 2017

The Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai, filed an appeal under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 against a common order dated 14th August ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Rejection of Application for Resending Remand Application in NDPS Case — Revision Petition Time-Barred and Writ Not Maintainable. The court held that the order rejecting the application for resending the remand application was not an interlocutory order, but the revision petition was filed beyond the limitation period of 90 days under Article 131 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and no condonation of delay was sought, hence the revision was not maintainable.

26 Jul 2018

The State of Maharashtra, through the DCB CID Unit I, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. Failure to Supply Public Analyst Report to Accused Deprived Him of Valuable Right to Get Sample Tested by Central Food Laboratory.

29 Oct 2018

The State of Maharashtra, through the Food Inspector, filed an appeal against the acquittal of the respondents (accused) by the Judicial Magistrate, F...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Service Tax Demand on Construction of Port Services. Services by way of construction of original works pertaining to a port are exempt from service tax under Notification No.25/2012-ST dated 20.06.2012, Entry No.14.

14 Dec 2018

The petitioners, JSW Dharmatar Port Pvt. Ltd. and JSW Jaigarh Port Ltd., are companies engaged in developing and operating ports. In the course of the...

54 55 56 57

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)