Search Results for "advocate withdrawal"

1949 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1949 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition, Restores Suit Dismissed as Withdrawn Without Consent of All Plaintiffs in Representative Suit Under Order I Rule 8 CPC. Suit filed under Order I Rule 8 CPC cannot be withdrawn by some plaintiffs without consent of all and without court permission.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs No.5, 7, and 9, filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Employee Contesting Election Without Permission. Regulation 48B of Bombay State Transport Employees Services Regulations Requires Prior Permission; Dismissal Upheld for Wilful Disobedience.

The appellant, Umesh Kalyanrao Galande, was a helper employed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation. He applied for permission to contes...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Credit Card Recovery Suit — Reduces Usurious Interest Rate of 2.5% per Month Compounded Monthly to 6% per Annum Simple. Contractual interest held unconscionable and against public policy under Section 34 CPC.

The appellant, B. Gopa Kumar, was a credit card holder of Canara Bank (respondent) and was issued a Cancard-Visa card in 1998. He defaulted on payment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition in Railway Concession Dispute — Directs Release of Iron Ore Consignment. Circular Offering 30% Concession on Iron Ore Transport Held Applicable to Consignments Booked Before Withdrawal.

The petitioners, M/s Kumaraswamy Mineral Exports (exporter) and NECC Roadways (transporter), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Against Arbitral Tribunal Order as Not Maintainable Under Section 115 CPC. Arbitral Tribunal Held Not a Court Subordinate to High Court, Hence Revision Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, The Karnataka Jesuit Educational Society, filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Trademark Dispute: Examination of Ex-Parte Injunction and Material Disclosure Obligations.

The case concerns a trademark dispute where Dharampal Satyapal Foods Ltd., the defendant, sought to vacate an ex-parte injunction granted to Parle Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CBFC Cuts Imposed on Film on Drug Addiction; Holds Pre-Censorship Must Conform to Article 19(2) Reasonable Restrictions. State's Decision to Delete References to Punjab and Mutilate Content Violates Freedom of Speech Under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.

The first petitioner, a film production company, sought a writ of certiorari to quash the decision of the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of AAIFR Order Setting Aside BIFR's Exclusion of ULC Land from Sick Company's Rehabilitation Scheme. The Court Examines Whether the Remand for Modification Was Justified Under SICA and ULC Provisions.

The petitioner, Swayam Realtors and Traders LLP, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay ...