High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Against Arbitral Tribunal Order as Not Maintainable Under Section 115 CPC. Arbitral Tribunal Held Not a Court Subordinate to High Court, Hence Revision Not Maintainable.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, The Karnataka Jesuit Educational Society, filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore. The petition challenged an order dated 17.08.2013 passed by an arbitral tribunal (Annexure-A). The arbitral tribunal had, inter alia, dismissed an application for transposition of parties and restored the arbitration to its original file after withdrawing its earlier withdrawal letter. The respondent, M/s. Salarpuria Properties Private Ltd., raised a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the revision petition, arguing that an arbitral tribunal is not a court subordinate to the High Court and thus Section 115 CPC does not apply. The court considered the sole issue of maintainability. It held that the revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 CPC is exercisable only over courts subordinate to the High Court. An arbitral tribunal is a private forum constituted by agreement of parties and is not a court under the CPC. The remedies against orders of an arbitral tribunal are provided under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which is a complete code in itself. Therefore, a civil revision petition under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against an order of an arbitral tribunal. Consequently, the court dismissed the revision petition as not maintainable, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure Code - Revisional Jurisdiction - Maintainability of Revision Against Arbitral Tribunal Order - Section 115 CPC - The court examined whether an order passed by an arbitral tribunal can be challenged under Section 115 CPC. Held that the revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 CPC is exercisable only over courts subordinate to the High Court, and an arbitral tribunal is not a court subordinate to the High Court. Therefore, a revision petition under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against an order of an arbitral tribunal. (Paras 1-5)

B) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Arbitral Tribunal - Status - Not a Court - The court noted that an arbitral tribunal is a private forum chosen by parties and is not a court under the CPC. The remedies against arbitral tribunal orders are provided under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and not under Section 115 CPC. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is maintainable against an order passed by an arbitral tribunal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The civil revision petition is dismissed as not maintainable. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Maintainability of civil revision petition under Section 115 CPC against arbitral tribunal orders
  • 'case decided' under Section 115 CPC
  • scope of revisional jurisdiction over arbitral proceedings
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (KAR) (11) 13

C.R.P.No.490/2013

2013-11-22

Aravind Kumar

Sri.Ajesh Kumar S. for petitioner, Sri.Suraj Govindaraj for respondent

The Karnataka Jesuit Educational Society

M/s. Salarpuria Properties Private Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil revision petition challenging an order of an arbitral tribunal

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to set aside the order dated 17.08.2013 passed by the arbitral tribunal

Filing Reason

Petitioner challenged the arbitral tribunal's order dismissing its application for transposition and restoring the arbitration

Previous Decisions

The arbitral tribunal had passed an order on 17.08.2013 dismissing the transposition application and restoring the arbitration

Issues

Whether a civil revision petition under Section 115 CPC is maintainable against an order of an arbitral tribunal

Submissions/Arguments

Respondent argued that the revision petition is not maintainable as an arbitral tribunal is not a court subordinate to the High Court under Section 115 CPC

Ratio Decidendi

An arbitral tribunal is not a court subordinate to the High Court, and therefore a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is not maintainable against an order passed by an arbitral tribunal.

Judgment Excerpts

Respondent before the arbitral tribunal has invoked revisional jurisdiction of this court namely under section 115 of C.P.C by questioning the order dated 17.08.2013 passed by arbitral tribunal the revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 of CPC is exercisable only over courts subordinate to the High Court an arbitral tribunal is not a court subordinate to the High Court

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 CPC before the High Court of Karnataka challenging an order dated 17.08.2013 of the arbitral tribunal. The respondent raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability. The court heard the parties on the maintainability issue and dismissed the petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 115
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of MVAT Provisions on Input Tax Credit Reversal for Capital Goods Sold as Scrap. Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 and Rule 58A of MVAT Rules, 2005 held intra vires the Constitution and not ultra vires ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Against Arbitral Tribunal Order as Not Maintainable Under Section 115 CPC. Arbitral Tribunal Held Not a Court Subordinate to High Court, Hence Revision Not Maintainable.