Search Results for "Reply Statement"

6953 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6953 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Petitioners in DCR Interpretation Case Following Supreme Court's Godrej & Boyce Ruling. The Court Holds That Paragraph 6 of Appendix VII Entitles Owner to DRC Equal to Area of Constructed Amenity, Rejecting Circulars Limiting to 25%.

Background: The consolidated writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under Article 226 of the Constitution concerning ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petition Alleging Illegal Demolition of Dwelling House and Seeking Compensation Under KMC Act, 1976. Allegations Include Backdating of Notices, Lack of Opportunity, and Collusion Between BBMP Officials and Private Respondent.

Background: The petitioner, a central government employee, purchased a residential property in Doddanekundi, Bengaluru, in 2005 from Dr. Suryakumar Sh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Assessment Order in MVAT Act Case Due to Limitation Bar and Violation of Natural Justice. Assessment Order Passed After Four-Year Limitation Period and Without Granting Personal Hearing Despite Request.

The petitioner, a dealer registered under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act), challenged an assessment order and notice of demand fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Cyber Fraud Case — Directs Bank to Refund Rs. 76.9 Lakhs Under RBI Circular. Unauthorized Addition of Beneficiaries and Absence of OTP Constitute Deficiency in Service Under RBI Circular Dated 6 July 2017.

The petitioners, a director and a closely held family company, maintained a bank account with Respondent No. 2 for 15-20 years. On 1 October 2022, unk...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices and Orders Under Section 153 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Valid Sanction and Non-Application of Mind. Reassessment proceedings initiated without proper approval under Section 151(2) and based on borrowed satisfaction are invalid.

The petitioner, Ashok Commercial Enterprises, filed nine writ petitions challenging reassessment notices dated 19th July 2021 and 14th July 2021 issue...