INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 25700 OF 2025
9 Oct 2025...
Search Results for "Land Disposal Policy"
1008 result(s) found
Found 1008 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Appeal on Taxability of Capital Gains from Transfer of Shares of a Cayman Islands Company Holding Indian Telecom Assets. The core issue involves whether the offshore transaction is liable to capital gains tax in India under the Income Tax Act, 1961, given that the company's value is derived from Indian telecom assets.
1 Aug 2026The matter concerned a tax dispute between Vodafone International Holdings BV (VIH), a Netherlands resident company, and the Indian Revenue authoritie...
- 65
High Court
Bombay High Court Holds Respondents in Contempt for Breach of Injunction Order. Resolutions Increasing Authorised Capital and Alloting Shares While Restrained from Exercising Rights on Shares Amount to Wilful Disobedience.
15 Nov 2006The appeal arose from Suit No.3121 of 2004, where the appellants (original plaintiffs, Gopal L. Raheja & Anr.) claimed that the respondents (original ...
- 23
High Court
Trustees’ Authority in Managing Encroached Land for Slum Rehabilitation: Bombay High Court Clarifies. Bombay High Court allows PLAINTIFFS to collaborate with developers to undertake slum rehabilitation on its encroached lands, empowering trustees under the Public Trust Act.
9 Oct 20241. Introduction:The plaintiffs, A. H. Wadia Trust, a public charitable trust, along with its trustees (Plaintiffs No. 2 to 5), approached the court vi...
- 2035
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Enforcement Petition for Foreign Award Citing Lack of Jurisdiction Due to Prior Section 34 Filing. Section 42 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Vests Exclusive Jurisdiction with the Court at Jamkhambalia Where the Section 34 Application Was First Filed.
20 Dec 2010The petitioners, Pacific Basin Ihx (UK) Ltd., a company incorporated in England engaged in shipping, sought enforcement of a foreign arbitration award...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes CIDCO's Tender Cancellation as Arbitrary and Unreasonable. Petitioner's Highest Bid Accepted After 21 Months, Cancellation Without Justification Violates Article 14.
22 Dec 2025The petitioner, Bhagwati Akshar Empire LLP, participated in an e-auction conducted by the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra L...
- 123
High Court
Bombay High Court at Aurangabad Considers Challenge to Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Inam Appeal. Question Involves Whether Service Inam Lands Are Exempt from Hyderabad Abolition of Inams and Cash Grants Act, 1954, and Whether Appeal Should Be Decided on Merits Despite Limitation.
11 Sep 2013The writ petition was filed in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging the order of the Divisional Commissioner, Aura...
- 26
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines PIL for Heritage Conservation — Government's Omission of Buildings from Heritage List Without Consultation and Reasons Under Section 31 of MRTP Act Challenged. Petitioner Society Asserts That Statutory Procedure Was Not Followed and Heritage Conservation Committee's Recommendations Were Ignored.
5 May 2006The Vidarbha Heritage Society, a registered society formed in 1997, filed a public interest litigation before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur seeking ...
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Redetermination of Compensation Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Technical Rejection for Lack of Certified Copies Set Aside. The court held that the Deputy Collector should have considered the application on merits or granted an opportunity to rectify the defect, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
1 Dec 2025The petitioners, legal representatives of the deceased claimant Shaliwan Raigonda Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 1 January 2...
- 101
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Order Holding Suit Maintainable Despite MRTP Act Bar. Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted Under Section 149 of MRTP Act Where Dispute Involves Title and Possession, Not Just Planning Violations.
16 Jan 2015The case involves a civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging an order dated 22/3/2013 passed by ...
- 120
