Search Results for "revenue officer"

6094 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6094 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes ITAT's Rectification Order in Income Tax Case — Tribunal Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 254(2) by Reviewing Its Own Decision. Mistake Apparent from Record Must Be Obvious and Not Require Re-appreciation of Evidence.

The petitioner, M/s. I.G. Petrochemicals Ltd., an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 05.09.202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Insurance Compensation for Crop Loss Due to Pest Attack. Court holds that pest attack is not an insured peril under the Crop Insurance Scheme and that the petitioner failed to establish any legal duty or right to claim compensation.

The petitioner, Libaraj s/o Tulshiram Tikle, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Aurang...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition; Revision Under Section 76 of BT & AL Act Maintainable Despite Prior Suo Motu Revision Under Section 76A. Full Bench Decision in Shireen Sami Gadiali (2011 (3) Mh.L.J. 486) Held Inapplicable as It Involved Section 154 of MCS Act, 1960, Not BT & AL Act.

The writ petition challenged an order of the President, Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Mumbai, dismissing a tenancy revision application as not maintai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudges Two Petitions Challenging Collector's Order Forfeiting Reclamation Lease and Imposing Payment Conditions. Petitions Examine Validity of Forfeiture and Entitlement to Regularization Under Rule 40 of Bombay Land Revenue Rules, 1921.

Two writ petitions, WP No. 7104 of 2002 by M/s Baf-Hira Builders Private Limited and WP No. 2004 of 2015 by Eric Anselem Mendes and Austin Gabriel Men...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Deduction for Record Production Bonus and Other Expenditures in Income Tax Reference. Payment of record production bonus not hit by section 36(1)(ii) as it was not paid out of profits but as an incentive for extra labour.

This is an income tax reference at the instance of the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax) against the assessee, M/s. Tata Iron & Steel Company Limit...