Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition for Mandamus Directing Tahsildar to Consider Representation for Patta in Encroachment Regularization Case. Petitioner's Residential Encroachment on Poramboke Land Recommended for Regularization Under G.O.Ms.No.318, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, 2019, and Court Directed Expeditious Disposal.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Madurai In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents—the District Collector, Revenue Divisional Officer, and Tahsildar—to grant patta for 180 sq.mt of land in S.No.263/7 at Aadanur Village, Ottapidaram Taluk, Thoothukudi District. The petitioner had encroached upon unobjectionable poramboke Vandi Pathai land and constructed a dwelling house. G.O.Ms.No.318, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, dated 30.08.2019, provided a scheme for regularization of such encroachments. A Revenue Inspector conducted a field inspection and submitted a report on 29.08.2022 recommending regularization and issuance of patta. Despite this recommendation, the third respondent Tahsildar did not pass any orders. The petitioner then filed a detailed representation on 20.12.2022 seeking patta, but no decision was taken. The petitioner approached the court seeking a direction for disposal of the representation. The court noted that the only relief sought was expeditious disposal in accordance with the G.O. and the Revenue Inspector's recommendation. The court allowed the writ petition and directed the third respondent to pass final orders on the representation within four weeks from the date of receipt of the order copy, considering the report and the G.O. No costs were awarded.

Headnote

A) Land Laws - Regularization of Encroachment - Government Order - G.O.Ms.No.318, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, dated 30.08.2019 - Petitioner claimed to have encroached upon unobjectionable poramboke Vandi Pathai land and built a dwelling house. Revenue Inspector recommended regularization. Petitioner sought direction to grant patta. Held that the third respondent is directed to pass final orders on petitioner's representation considering the report and G.O., within four weeks. (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents should be directed to grant patta to the petitioner by regularizing the encroachment of unobjectionable poramboke Vandi Pathai land under G.O.Ms.No.318 dated 30.08.2019

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition was allowed, with a direction to the third respondent (Tahsildar, Ottapidaram Taluk) to pass final orders on the petitioner's representation dated 20.12.2022, considering the Revenue Inspector's report dated 29.08.2022 and G.O.Ms.No.318, Revenue and Disaster Management Department dated 30.08.2019, within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Legal points not extracted
  • writ of mandamus for expeditious disposal
  • consideration of representation in light of G.O.Ms.No.318
  • Revenue and Disaster Management Department
  • 30.08.2019
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (03) 250

W.P.(MD)No.725 of 2023

2025-03-06

P.B.Balaji

Citation not available

I.Pinaygash, K.Malathi

P.Gnanasekar

1. The District Collector, Collectorate, Thoothukudi District., 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District., 3. The Tahsildar, Ottapidaram Taluk Office, Thoothukudi District.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to grant patta for an encroached poramboke land by regularization under G.O.Ms.No.318.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a direction to respondents to grant patta for 180 sq.mt land in S.No.263/7 at Aadanur Village, Thoothukudi District, by regularizing his residential encroachment.

Filing Reason

Petitioner had encroached upon unobjectionable poramboke Vandi Pathai land and built a dwelling house. Revenue Inspector recommended regularization and petitioner filed representation for patta, but no orders were passed by the Tahsildar.

Previous Decisions

Revenue Inspector recommended regularization on 29.08.2022; no orders passed by Tahsildar; petitioner filed representation on 20.12.2022.

Issues

Whether a writ of mandamus should be issued directing the respondents to grant patta to the petitioner by regularizing the encroachment of unobjectionable poramboke Vandi Pathai land under G.O.Ms.No.318, Revenue and Disaster Management Department dated 30.08.2019.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner contended that he had encroached upon unobjectionable poramboke Vandi Pathai land and built a dwelling house, that G.O.Ms.No.318 provides for regularization of such encroachments, that the Revenue Inspector recommended regularization, but the third respondent had not passed any orders, and therefore sought a direction for disposal of his representation.

Ratio Decidendi

Where a representation for regularization of encroachment is pending and a government order provides for such regularization, a writ of mandamus may be issued directing the authority to pass orders expeditiously, especially when a field inspection report recommends regularization.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner seeks issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to grant patta to the petitioner... The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner has put up a dwelling house by way of encroaching into unobjectionable poromboke Vandi Pathai land. The Revenue Inspector, Eppothumvendran, has also conducted field inspection and has recommended for regularization of the encroachment made by the petitioner and for issuance of patta. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is allowed, with a direction to the third respondent to pass final orders on the petitioner's representation dated 20.12.2022, considering the report of the Revenue Inspector dated 29.08.2022 and also G.O.Ms.No.318, Revenue and Disaster Management Department dated 30.08.2019.

Procedural History

Petitioner encroached upon poramboke Vandi Pathai land and constructed a dwelling house. G.O.Ms.No.318, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, dated 30.08.2019, provided for regularization of such encroachments. Revenue Inspector conducted field inspection and recommended regularization on 29.08.2022. Petitioner submitted a representation dated 20.12.2022 seeking patta. The third respondent Tahsildar did not pass any orders. Petitioner filed W.P.(MD)No.725 of 2023 before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court. The court heard the matter and allowed the writ petition on 06.03.2025, directing the Tahsildar to pass orders within four weeks.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India, 1950: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition for Mandamus Directing Tahsildar to Consider Representation for Patta in Encroachment Regularization Case. Petitioner's Residential Encroachment on Poramboke Land Recommended for Regularization Under G.O.Ms.No.3...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Injunction in Copyright Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Generic Religious Symbols Lack Originality. Artistic works depicting deities and religious symbols held not original under Copyright Act, 1957, as they ...