Search Results for "production before judicial officer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "production before judicial officer"

1667 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1667 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition in Customs Act Detention Case — Detention Held Not Illegal. Petitioner's arrest under Section 104 of Customs Act, 1962 and subsequent judicial custody were lawful; no violation of Articles 14, 21, 22 of Constitution found.

21 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Ankit Ghanshyam Mutha, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus and direction for his release from custody of the Directo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Validity of Rule 86E of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961 in Recovery Proceedings. Court Holds That Rule 86E Is Not Ultra Vires Article 14 as Proceedings Under Section 101 Are Summary and Do Not Require Cross-Examination, and Alternative Remedy Under Section 154 Is Available.

9 Dec 2011

The two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the constitutional validity of Rule 86E of the Maharas...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Default Bail in POCSO Case Due to Non-Completion of Investigation Within 60 Days. The right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC is an indefeasible right that accrues when the investigation is not completed within the prescribed period, and the accused is entitled to be released on bail if the charge sheet is not filed within that period.

4 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Moulali S/o Babajan Challal, was arrested in connection with offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n), 506 of the Indian Penal Cod...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Default Bail in POCSO Case Due to Non-Completion of Investigation Within 60 Days. Petitioner Entitled to Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC as Charge Sheet Filed After Expiry of 60 Days from First Remand.

4 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Moulali, was arrested on 01.12.2024 in connection with offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n), 506 of IPC and Sections 4, 6, 8, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Default Bail in POCSO Case Due to Non-Completion of Investigation Within 60 Days. Petitioner Enlarged on Bail Under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. as Charge Sheet Not Filed Within Statutory Period.

4 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Moulali, was arrested on 03.12.2024 in connection with offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n), 506 of IPC and Sections 4, 6, 8, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reserved Judgment on Writ Petition Challenging Order Rejecting Additional Evidence. Application for Production of Additional Evidence in Municipal Appeal Under Section 406 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act 1949 Was Rejected by Civil Judge for Non-Compliance with Order 41 Rule 27 CPC.

9 Jun 2025

The petitioner, Jindal Poly Films Ltd., engaged in import of goods stored at Navi Mumbai, was assessed under the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Appeal Against Vacation of Stay on Bank Guarantee Invocation. Court holds that the arbitral tribunal's interim order under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, granting stay on invocation of performance bank guarantees, cannot be vacated solely on the ground of balance of convenience when there is a serious dispute regarding the underlying contract and the invocation is alleged to be fraudulent.

10 Sep 2025

The appellant, M/s. Pinnacle Teleservices Pvt. Ltd., filed an arbitration appeal against the order dated 27-08-2024 passed by the learned District Jud...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench adjudicates the limitation period for recovery of electricity charges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Conflicting Division Bench decisions on whether dues beyond two years can be recovered when not continuously shown as arrears are reconciled.

12 Mar 2019

The case originated from a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman regarding recovery of electricity dues for a period beyond ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Manufacturer in Central Excise Duty Dispute on Captive Consumption of Yarn. Court Holds That Bank Guarantees Furnished Under Interim Order Can Be Enforced Without Section 11A Notice.

9 Dec 2019

The appellant, M/s. The Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture of cotton and manmade fabrics. It claimed that the fabric manufa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Employee's Petition and Dismisses Employer's Cross-Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employee Denied SSRP Scheme but Granted Reinstatement Without Back Wages or Lumpsum Compensation. Reinstatement with continuity of service upheld but lumpsum compensation option set aside as not a valid alternative under Section 30 of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

8 Aug 2013

The judgment involves two cross writ petitions arising from an order of the 7th Labour Court, Mumbai in Complaint (ULP) No.236 of 1994. The employee, ...

53 54 55 56 57

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)