High Court of Karnataka Allows Default Bail in POCSO Case Due to Non-Completion of Investigation Within 60 Days. Petitioner Entitled to Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC as Charge Sheet Filed After Expiry of 60 Days from First Remand.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Accused
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Moulali, was arrested on 01.12.2024 in connection with offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n), 506 of IPC and Sections 4, 6, 8, 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. He was produced before the jurisdictional magistrate on 02.12.2024 and remanded to judicial custody. The investigation was not completed within 60 days from the date of first remand. The petitioner filed an application for default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC read with Section 187 BNSS, which was rejected by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, FTSC-I, Haveri on 01.02.2025. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed a criminal revision petition before the High Court. The High Court held that the petitioner had completed 60 days in custody from the date of first remand and the investigation was not completed within that period. The charge sheet was filed only on 03.02.2025, after the expiry of 60 days. Relying on the principle that the right to default bail accrues on the expiry of the statutory period and cannot be defeated by subsequent filing of charge sheet, the High Court set aside the impugned order and directed that the petitioner be enlarged on default bail on such terms as the trial court deems fit.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Default Bail - Section 167(2) CrPC, Section 187 BNSS - Right to bail on expiry of investigation period - The petitioner was arrested for offences under IPC and POCSO Act; investigation not completed within 60 days from first remand; held that the petitioner is entitled to default bail as the right accrued on expiry of 60 days and the charge sheet filed thereafter does not extinguish the right (Paras 5-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC read with Section 187 BNSS when the investigation was not completed within 60 days from the date of first remand.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The order dated 01.02.2025 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, FTSC-I, Haveri in Spl.S.C.No.08/2025 is set aside. The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on default bail on such terms and conditions as the trial court deems fit.

Law Points

  • Default bail
  • Section 167(2) CrPC
  • Section 187 BNSS
  • POCSO Act
  • Right to bail on expiry of investigation period
  • Mandatory bail
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (KAR) (05) 24

CRL.RP No. 100051 of 2025

2025-03-04

V.Srishananda

Sri Aravind D. Kulkarni, Smt. Girija S. Hiremath, Sri Umesh P. Hakkarki, Sri M.V. Hiremath

Moulali S/o. Babajan Challal

State of Karnataka through Adur Police Station and Akhilabanu W/o. Shabbir Ahmad Mansoor

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal revision petition against rejection of default bail application

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeks setting aside of order dated 01.02.2025 rejecting default bail and enlargement on default bail

Filing Reason

Investigation not completed within 60 days from first remand; charge sheet filed after expiry of 60 days

Previous Decisions

Additional District and Sessions Judge, FTSC-I, Haveri rejected default bail application on 01.02.2025 in Spl.S.C.No.08/2025

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC read with Section 187 BNSS when investigation not completed within 60 days from first remand.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he was arrested on 01.12.2024, produced before magistrate on 02.12.2024, and 60 days expired on 31.01.2025; charge sheet filed on 03.02.2025 after expiry; hence entitled to default bail. Respondents opposed the petition, but the court found that the right to default bail had accrued.

Ratio Decidendi

The right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC read with Section 187 BNSS accrues on the expiry of the statutory period of 60 days from the date of first remand if investigation is not completed. Subsequent filing of charge sheet does not extinguish the accrued right.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner has completed 60 days in the custody from the date of first remand and the investigation was not completed within 60 days. The right to default bail accrued on the expiry of 60 days and the charge sheet filed thereafter does not extinguish the right.

Procedural History

Petitioner arrested on 01.12.2024, produced before magistrate on 02.12.2024 and remanded. Filed default bail application under Section 167(2) CrPC/187 BNSS, rejected on 01.02.2025 by Additional District and Sessions Judge, FTSC-I, Haveri. Filed criminal revision petition before High Court on 04.03.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): Section 397, Section 167(2)
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS): Section 438, Section 442, Section 187
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): Section 376(2)(n), Section 506
  • Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act): Section 4, Section 6, Section 8, Section 12
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Default Bail in POCSO Case Due to Non-Completion of Investigation Within 60 Days. Petitioner Entitled to Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC as Charge Sheet Filed After Expiry of 60 Days from First Remand.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Daily Wage Employee Against Municipal Council for Unfair Labour Practice. Reinstatement with Back Wages Granted as Termination Without Notice and Without Following Seniority Under Section 25G of Industrial Dispute...