Search Results for "implied compliance"

811 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 811 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with 30% Backwages for Workman. Termination of Daily Wager Without Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal.

The judgment arises from two Special Civil Applications filed under Articles 14, 21, 226, and 227 of the Constitution of India read with the Industria...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Continuity and 30% Backwages for Workman in Industrial Disputes Act Case. Employer's Challenge Dismissed for Failure to Produce Evidence of Abandonment or Non-Completion of 240 Days Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The judgment arises from two Special Civil Applications filed under Articles 14, 21, 226, and 227 of the Constitution of India read with the Industria...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Orders of MSEDCL Employees — Transfer Policy Upheld as Binding. Allegations of Mala Fides Not Entertained Without Impleading the Officer.

The petitioners, employees of Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL), challenged their transfer orders issued by the company...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Blacklisting of Supplier by Central Bank of India for Non-Supply Due to Force Majeure. Natural Calamity in Thailand Constitutes Force Majeure Excusing Performance Under Contract Law Principles.

The petitioner, M/s. Acer India (Pvt.) Ltd., a private limited company engaged in supplying computer software and hardware, challenged its blacklistin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Case, Holding That Acceptance of Delayed Possession Without Protest Does Not Waive Right to Interest Under Section 18 of RERA. Statutory Right to Interest Under RERA Cannot Be Waived by Mere Acceptance of Possession Without a Clear Agreement.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against an order of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in RERA Delayed Possession Case, Upholds Allottees' Right to Interest. Section 18 of RERA Overrides Section 55 of Contract Act; Acceptance of Delayed Possession Does Not Waive Right to Compensation.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against the judgment of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award; Limits Court Intervention in Arbitration Scope of judicial intervention in arbitration is limited under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Acts and Sections Discussed: Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34: Application for setting aside an arbitral award. Section 37: Ap...