Search Results for "duty paid"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "duty paid"

6778 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6778 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Labelling Activity Does Not Amount to Manufacture Under Note 3 to Chapter 18 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Additional labelling on already marketable goods without enhancing marketability does not constitute manufacture, and extended period of limitation is applicable due to suppression of facts.

30 Apr 2024

The case involves a batch of civil appeals filed by the revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise) against an order of CESTAT which allowed the responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Temporary Injunction in Specific Performance Suit — Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience Found in Favour of Plaintiff-Builder Under Memorandum of Understanding. The court held that the Memorandum of Understanding dated 21.5.2011 constituted a binding agreement for sale and the plaintiff had made out a prima facie case for grant of injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

5 May 2017

The appellant, M/s. Merces Builders Private Limited, filed an appeal against an order dated 16.4.2016 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Panaji...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Bombay Stamp Act Provisions on Sale Certificates in Execution Proceedings. Interpretation of 'Instrument' under Section 147 of Delhi Municipal Corporation Act Not Extended to Bombay Stamp Act.

16 Mar 2011

The case involves a reference under Section 113 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, made by the Principal District Judge, Aurangabad, to the Bombay ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Central Excise Duty Demand and Penalty. Petitioner failed to show any jurisdictional error or perversity in concurrent findings of fact regarding duty demand and penalty under Central Excise Rules.

16 Jul 2019

The petitioner, M/s. Mandovi Ispat Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay at ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Discharge Rejection in Bombay Prohibition Act Case — Subsequent Purchasers Not Liable for Excise Duty on Imported Liquor. Court holds that under the Bombay Prohibition Act, liability to pay excise duty on imported liquor rests with the first purchaser who imports it into the State, and subsequent purchasers who transport within the State cannot be prosecuted for non-payment of duty.

16 Dec 2016

The case involves two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) by Dayal Marumal Bhojwani (accused ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows State's Revision and Dismisses Accused's Revision in Lokayukta Case — Sanction for Prosecution Required Before Taking Cognizance, Not Before Filing Charge Sheet. The court clarified that under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, sanction is a condition precedent for taking cognizance, not for filing charge sheet, and set aside the trial court's order directing the police to obtain sanction before filing charge sheet.

1 Apr 2016

The case involves two criminal revision petitions: one filed by the State through Lokayukta Police, Gulbarga (Crl.RP No.659/2008) and another by the a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Directing Filing of Charge Sheet Without Sanction in Prevention of Corruption Act Case. Sanction for Prosecution Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is Mandatory Before Cognizance Can Be Taken by Special Judge.

1 Apr 2016

The case involves two criminal revision petitions arising from an order dated 15.03.2008 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Gulbarga, in Special ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows State's Revision and Dismisses Accused's Revision in Lokayukta Case — Sanction for Prosecution Under Prevention of Corruption Act Must Be Obtained Before Filing Charge Sheet. The court held that sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is a condition precedent for taking cognizance, not for filing charge sheet, and the Special Judge erred in directing the police to obtain sanction before filing charge sheet.

1 Apr 2016

The case involves two criminal revision petitions: one filed by the State through Lokayukta Police, Gulbarga, and the other by the accused, Sadashiva ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Accused's Revision Petition in Prevention of Corruption Act Case — Order Directing Filing of Charge Sheet Without Sanction Set Aside. Sanction for prosecution under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is mandatory and cannot be dispensed with by the Special Judge.

1 Apr 2016

The case involves two criminal revision petitions: one filed by the State through Lokayukta Police, Gulbarga, and the other by the accused, Sadashiva ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to File Written Statement Under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC. Court Held That the Trial Court's Discretion to Refuse Extension of Time for Filing Written Statement Beyond 90 Days Was Justified as the Petitioner Failed to Show Sufficient Cause.

17 Feb 2014

The petitioner, who was the plaintiff in Original Suit No. 623/2009 pending before the III Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Belgaum, filed a writ peti...

53 54 55 56 57

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)