Search Results for "Section 13(1)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Section 13(1)"

1552 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1552 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.

20 Jul 2016

The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...

High Court

CRIMINAL CONFIRMATION CASE NO. 02 OF 2024

11 Nov 2025

The case stems from Crime No. 634 of 2022 registered at Kalamna Police Station for multiple offences including murder (Section 302 IPC), attempted mur...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Police Officer in SC/ST Act Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Initiation of prosecution against a public servant without prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC is void ab initio.

22 Aug 2014

The petitioner, Sri Labhuram, a Deputy Commissioner of Police (Crime) in Bangalore, filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash the order...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal of Sugar Factory in Central Excise Duty Dispute — Section 11-D of Central Excise Act, 1944 Applies Even When Exemption Under Section 5-A is Available. The court held that the amount collected as duty from buyers is recoverable under Section 11-D regardless of exemption, and the assessee cannot retain such amount.

8 Sep 2017

The appellant, Jalna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a sugar factory, filed a first appeal under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challeng...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Petition Challenging Age Limit for Adoptive Mother's Maternity Benefit; Declares Section 60(4) of Code on Social Security, 2020 Unconstitutional. The Court Held That Restricting Benefit to Child Below Three Months Violates Articles 14 and 21 by Creating Arbitrary Classification and Denying Reproductive Autonomy.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court adjudicated a public interest petition challenging the constitutionality of Section 60(4) of the Code on Social Security, 2020, whic...

High Court

High Court Upholds Industrial Tribunal's Finding that Forest Department is an 'Industry' under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Workman Denied Reinstatement with Back Wages Due to Lack of Regularisation Policy. The Court held that the Forest Department's activities are not sovereign functions and thus fall within the definition of 'industry' under Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, but the daily wage workman was not entitled to back wages or continuity of service as there was no regularisation scheme.

10 Sep 2013

The case involves two writ petitions: one by the State of Karnataka and its forest authorities challenging the Industrial Tribunal's award dated 14.09...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Favour of Contractor in Postal Department Contract Dispute — Claims for Idle Labour, Machinery, and Loss of Profit Held Not Supported by Evidence and Contrary to Contract Terms. The court held that an arbitrator cannot award damages for idle resources or loss of profit without proof of deployment or anticipated profits, and such awards are perverse and patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Feb 2020

The Petitioner, Union of India through the Postal Department, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against High Court Ruling That Canteen Workers of Subsidiary Are Not Employees of Air India — Corporate Veil Not Lifted in Absence of Fraud. Workmen of Statutory Canteen Run by Wholly-Owned Subsidiary Under Factories Act Not Deemed Employees of Holding Company When No Direct Control or Sham Arrangement Proven.

1 Aug 2026

Background: The litigation arose from an industrial dispute raised by workmen employed by Chef Air, a unit of Hotel Corporation of India (HCI), who op...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Suit Challenging Tahsildar's Order for Approach Road. Suit for Perpetual Injunction Not Barred Despite Exhaustion of Appeal Remedy Under Section 143(3) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

27 Sep 2024

The case arises from a dispute over an approach road granted by the Nayab Tahsildar, Latur, under Section 143 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 19...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Dissenting Financial Creditor in Insolvency Resolution Process Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Approval of Resolution Plan by Committee of Creditors Based on Commercial Wisdom is Not Subject to Judicial Review on Grounds of Security Interest Value Omission, as Per Section 30(4) and Limited Scope Under Section 61(3).

13 May 2021

The appeal arose from a dispute under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, involving the corporate debtor VSP Udyog Private Limited. The appellan...

53 54 55 56 57

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)