CRIMINAL CONFIRMATION CASE NO. 02 OF 2024

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case stems from Crime No. 634 of 2022 registered at Kalamna Police Station for multiple offences including murder (Section 302 IPC), attempted murder (Section 307 IPC), causing hurt (Section 323 IPC), false information and fabrication of evidence (Sections 182, 193, 194, 196, 203 IPC), criminal conspiracy (Section 120-B IPC), aggravated penetrative sexual assault (Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012), and cruelty against a child (Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015). Initially, the FIR was lodged by Ashwini Durgaprasad Deshbhratar, the maternal aunt of the victim, against Kaushalya Piparde, Santosh Piparde, Dashrath Piparde, and Kalpana Piparde. However, these four were subsequently discharged after investigation revealed that the real perpetrator was the victim's father, Guddu Chhotelal Rajak. The victim girl was the elder daughter of the accused; she had a younger sister (referred to as 'N') and a brother Gaurav. Their mother had earlier died by suicide. The accused later married Kaushalya. On the morning of 6 November 2022, PSI Manoj Raut received a phone call about a girl hanging at her residence. Police reached the spot and found the victim girl hanging from a hook with suicide notes nearby, implicating the four discharged persons. Investigation, however, uncovered that the accused had staged the suicide. A search of the accused's mobile phone revealed photographs of the incident taken prior to death: the victim girl was alive, standing on a stool with a rope around her neck, and the accused was seen talking to her. The phone also contained photographs of the suicide notes, taken in October 2022, predating the incident. Crucially, the younger daughter 'N' stated that her father forced the victim to stand on a stool, tied a rope around her neck, and then removed the stool, causing her death. Postmortem revealed that the victim had been raped, leading to the addition of Section 376 IPC. 'N' also disclosed that all siblings were mercilessly beaten by the accused, prompting the addition of Sections 323 IPC and 75 JJ Act. The trial was conducted before the Special Court (POCSO) and Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, which convicted the accused on all counts except Section 201 IPC. The sentences included the death penalty for murder (Section 302 IPC) and for rape (Section 6 POCSO Act), life imprisonment for attempted murder and criminal conspiracy, and varying terms for other offences. As per mandatory procedure under Section 366(1) CrPC, the confirmation of the death sentence was referred to the High Court. The accused also filed a criminal appeal challenging the conviction and sentence. Both the confirmation case and the appeal were heard together, and the Court reserved judgment on 22 April 2025 and pronounced it on 11 November 2025. The judgment record notes the prosecution examined 25 witnesses; the provided excerpt only lists the first six. The final decision of the High Court is not included in the excerpt.

Issue of Consideration

CRIMINAL CONFIRMATION CASE NO. 02 OF 2024

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (11) 221

Criminal Confirmation Case No. 02 of 2024 and Criminal Appeal No. 322 of 2024

2025-11-11

Anil S. Kilor, Pravin S. Patil

2025:BHC-NAG:11757-DB

D. V. Chauhan, A.B. Badar, Deepali Sapkal, A.S. Mardikar, Shivkumar Dwivedi, Shreya Rastogi, Manasa Ramakrishna, S.A. Siddique, S.S. Ali, Ved Deshpande, D.P. Singh, Punam Pisurde

Guddu Chhotelal Rajak

State of Maharashtra and XYZ Victim

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal confirmation case and appeal against conviction and death sentence

Remedy Sought

Convict seeks acquittal alternatively reduction of sentence; State seeks confirmation of death sentence

Filing Reason

Conviction and death sentence by the trial court

Previous Decisions

Conviction and sentence by Special Court (POCSO) on 21/05/2024

Judgment Excerpts

In the Crime No.634 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 323, 182, 193, 194, 196, 203, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code... and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012... The accused has been convicted ... for the offences punishable as follows ... i) Under Section 302 of IPC – sentenced to suffer death and to pay fine of Rs.50,000/- ... From the statement of the younger daughter ‘N’, it was found that her father, i.e. accused, caused the victim girl to stand on a stool and tied a rope around her neck. He later removed the stool, which caused the death of the victim girl. During the house search of the accused ... a mobile phone having two sim-cards recovered from one rice container. She inspected the mobile of the accused Guddu Rajak, in which, she found photos of the incident wherein the victim girl was alive and was standing on a stool and had a rope around her neck. The accused was also seen talking to her.

Procedural History

On 06/11/2022, FIR No. 634/2022 registered by Ashwini Deshbhratar initially against four persons. Investigation led to addition of accused Guddu Rajak and discharge of original accused. Charges included Sections 302, 307, 323, 182, 193, 194, 196, 203, 120B, 376 IPC, Section 6 POCSO Act, Section 75 JJ Act. Trial conducted in Special Court (POCSO), Nagpur. On 21/05/2024, accused convicted and sentenced to death for murder and rape, and other sentences. The confirmation case (No. 02/2024) referred to High Court under Section 366(1) CrPC. Accused filed Criminal Appeal No. 322/2024. Both heard together, order reserved on 22/04/2025, pronounced on 11/11/2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 307, 323, 182, 193, 194, 196, 203, 201, 376(2)(f), 376(2)(n), 120B
  • Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012: 6
  • Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015: 75
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 366(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court CRIMINAL CONFIRMATION CASE NO. 02 OF 2024
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Pre-emption Case, Holding Limitation Runs from Each Sale Under Rajasthan Pre-Emption Act, 1966. Each Sale of Property Gives Fresh Cause of Action for Pre-emption, and Failure to Challenge Earlier Sales Does Not Bar t...