Search Results for "Industrial Court discretion"

1603 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1603 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Workmen's Right to Claim Both Gratuity and Retrenchment Compensation; Section 25F(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, interpreted to allow dual benefits.

The dispute originated from an industrial reference between the Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. and its workmen concerning a claim for gratuity. The employe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Common Judgment in Letters Patent Appeals Against Dismissal of Writ Petitions in Land Lease Resumption Case — Outcome Not Stated in Provided Excerpt

The dispute pertained to a plot of land in Bandra, Mumbai, originally leased by the Secretary of State for India in 1906 to Mrs. E.J. Menesse and othe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Appeals Against Company Law Board Order Directing Buyout of Majority Stake in Wind Energy Company. The majority shareholder challenged the finding of oppression and the forced sale of shares to minority shareholders under sections 397, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The proceedings arose from disputes between the shareholders of Enercon (India) Limited, now known as Wind World (India) Limited, a company engaged in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Applicability of MIR Act to Electricity Company. Held that the Maharashtra Industrial Relations Act, 1946 applies to the electricity industry under Entry 36 of Schedule I, and the petition was grossly delayed.

The petitioner, Adani Electricity Mumbai Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the orders of reference dated 20th August 2019 passed by the Chief Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Conductor in MSRTC Ticketless Travel Case — Reinstatement Set Aside as Punishment Not Disproportionate. The court held that the Industrial Court's revisional order restoring dismissal was not perverse and did not warrant interference under Article 227.

The petitioner, Mahadeo Shripati Khot, was a conductor employed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) since December 1988. On 31...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petition Seeking Compensation Under Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 for Land Allegedly Used for Government School and Road Since 1957. Petition Challenges Denial of Compensation Based on Inordinate Delay and Voluntary Handover by Predecessor.

The dispute arose from land in Survey No.51 of Haradagere Village, Tumkur District, originally owned by the father of the first petitioner. The proper...