Search Results for "mandatory obligation"

2419 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2419 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reviews Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA Act for Alleged Smuggling of Red Sanders. Questions Raised Over Violation of Right to Equal Representation and Proper Subjective Satisfaction.

The petition was filed by the wife of the detenu Ajit Bapu Satam, challenging his preventive detention under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Directors in Dishonour of Cheque Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations and Non-Impleadment of Company. Vicarious liability under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 requires specific averments and company must be made accused.

The petitioners, Harry Inder Dhaul, Narayan Singh Pathania, and Mikhail s/o Harry Dhaul, were directors of Siddhayu Ayurvedic Research Foundation Priv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging RBI's Moratorium and Liquidation of CKP Co-operative Bank Ltd. — Petitioners' Deposits Not Covered by Deposit Insurance as Bank Was Under Moratorium Prior to Insurance Scheme Introduction.

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by depositors of the CKP Co-operative Bank Ltd., which was placed under moratorium by the Res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Port Trust's Eviction Notices for Unauthorized Occupants. Held that lessees/licensees whose tenures expired and who continued in possession without consent are unauthorized occupants liable to eviction under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963.

The judgment concerns a group of writ petitions filed by various entities who were originally lessees or licensees of land belonging to the Board of T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...