Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Employee with Disability in Service Denial Case — Failure to Provide Reasonable Accommodation Violates Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. The court held that denial of appointment based on disability without considering reasonable accommodation is illegal and directed reconsideration.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 108
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Smt. Jyoti Jayesh Tayade, a person with 40% locomotor disability, applied for the post of Security Guard with the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (BMC). She was selected in the written test and interview but was denied appointment on the ground of being medically unfit due to her disability. The petitioner challenged this denial, arguing that the BMC failed to provide reasonable accommodation as required under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. The court examined the provisions of the Act, particularly Section 20 which prohibits discrimination and mandates reasonable accommodation. The court held that the employer must assess whether the candidate can perform the essential functions of the job with reasonable accommodation, and a blanket rejection based on disability is illegal. The court allowed the writ petition, directing the BMC to reconsider the petitioner's candidature by providing reasonable accommodation and to appoint her if she is found fit with such accommodation. The judgment emphasizes the importance of inclusive employment practices and the duty of employers to make adjustments for persons with disabilities.

Headnote

A) Disability Law - Reasonable Accommodation - Section 20, Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 - The petitioner, a person with 40% locomotor disability, was denied appointment as a Security Guard by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai on the ground of being medically unfit, without considering reasonable accommodation. The court held that the employer must provide reasonable accommodation and cannot deny employment solely on the basis of disability. (Paras 1-15)

B) Service Law - Medical Fitness - Section 47, Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 - The court held that the medical examination must consider the nature of disability and the possibility of reasonable accommodation, and a blanket rejection is impermissible. (Paras 16-25)

C) Constitutional Law - Right to Equality - Article 14, Constitution of India - The court held that discrimination against persons with disabilities in employment violates the right to equality and the state must ensure equal opportunity. (Paras 26-30)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the denial of appointment to a person with disability on the ground of physical unfitness, without providing reasonable accommodation, violates the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition allowed. The court directed the BMC to reconsider the petitioner's candidature by providing reasonable accommodation and to appoint her if found fit with such accommodation.

Law Points

  • Reasonable accommodation
  • Disability discrimination
  • Service law
  • Writ jurisdiction
  • Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act
  • 2016
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025:BHC-AS:45681-DB

Writ Petition No. 4209 of 2017

2025-10-17

SUMAN SHYAM, MANJUSHA DESHPANDE

2025:BHC-AS:45681-DB

Mr. Suresh Pakale, Senior Advocate i/b. Mr. Nilesh Desai, for the Petitioner. Mr. A. V. Bukhari, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Burhan Bukhari and Mr. Santosh Parad, for the Respondents – BMC.

Smt. Jyoti Jayesh Tayade

The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging denial of appointment on ground of disability.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought direction to appoint her as Security Guard with reasonable accommodation.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was denied appointment due to being medically unfit on account of her locomotor disability.

Issues

Whether denial of appointment based on disability without providing reasonable accommodation violates the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. Whether the medical examination report can be the sole basis for rejecting a candidate with disability.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that she was selected in written test and interview but denied appointment due to disability, and that BMC failed to provide reasonable accommodation. Respondents argued that the petitioner was found medically unfit and that the post of Security Guard requires physical fitness which she lacked.

Ratio Decidendi

An employer cannot deny employment to a person with disability solely on the ground of medical unfitness without considering reasonable accommodation as mandated under Section 20 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.

Judgment Excerpts

The court held that the employer must provide reasonable accommodation and cannot deny employment solely on the basis of disability. The medical examination must consider the nature of disability and the possibility of reasonable accommodation.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay challenging the denial of appointment. The court reserved judgment on 10th October 2025 and delivered on 17th October 2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016: Section 20
  • Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995: Section 47
  • Constitution of India: Article 14
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Employee with Disability in Service Denial Case — Failure to Provide Reasonable Accommodation Violates Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. The court held that denial of appointment based on disab...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Petition for Interim Maintenance in Family Court Dispute — Suppression of Facts Not Established and Ability to Earn Not Sufficient to Deny Maintenance. The Court held that the Family Court erred in rejecting interim ...