Search Results for "commercial vehicle"

582 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 582 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement in Commercial Suit, Rejecting Limitation Bar Under Article 137. Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963 Held Inapplicable to Applications for Amendment of Pleadings, Allowing Defendants to Elaborate Existing Defences.

The case involves a Chamber Summons taken out by defendant nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5 in Suit No. 2256 of 1998 pending before the Bombay High Court. The defe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Loan Dispute, Upholds Financer's Claim. Court holds that existence of arbitration agreement is not a jurisdictional issue under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the award is not patently illegal.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions: Arbitration Petition No. 783 of 2011 filed by the borrowers (M/s. Sahyadri Earthmovers and its partne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals by Developer in Possession Suits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Cannot Be Reopened Under Section 100 CPC. Suits for possession based on title and prior possession were decreed; no substantial question of law arose.

The appellant, M/s. Samruddhi Developers, a partnership firm, filed four second appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute Involving Nominal Sale Deed and Bank's Securitization Proceedings. Civil Court's jurisdiction barred under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 for challenging bank's attachment notice under Section 13(2).

The appellants, Smt. Savita Bhagwantrao Patil and Chaitanya Bhagwantrao Patil, were the original plaintiffs in a suit filed before the 6th Joint Civil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admits Winding Up Petition Against Syrma Technology Pvt. Ltd. for Non-Payment of Admitted Debt Despite Insurance Payment. Court holds that receipt of insurance proceeds does not extinguish the debt or bar winding up proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, Jiangsu Skyrun Wuxi Co. Ltd., filed a company petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of Syrma Tec...