Search Results for "additional cost"

4572 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4572 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Contract Dispute — Remands Case for Fresh Consideration of Counterclaim Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Opportunity to Lead Evidence on Counterclaim Under Order 8 Rule 6A CPC Warrants Remand.

The appellant, Executive Engineer of Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, filed a suit for damages of Rs. 17,28,855.65 against the respondent, Kat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Rectification of Trade Mark Registrations for 'WHISPER' and 'ALWAYS' Marks — Petitioner's Prior Use and Well-Known Status Established, Respondent's Registration Cancelled.

The petitioner, The Procter & Gamble Company, a multinational corporation, filed three original petitions under Sections 47, 57, and 125 of the Trade ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against CESTAT Order in Service Tax Case — Limitation Bar Not Applicable. The court held that the Tribunal erred in dismissing the appeal on limitation grounds when the appeal was filed within the prescribed period under Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994.

The petitioner, M/s. Practice Strategic Communications India Private Limited, a company providing management services, was issued a show cause notice ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Issues Rule in Writ Petition Against Municipal Corporation's Absorption of Builder's Employees. The Court entertained the challenge under Article 226 to Resolution No. 25 and order dated 27.06.2007 absorbing 69 persons, directing final hearing forthwith.

The petitioners, 69 unemployed youths from Thane district, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the High Court of Judica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...