High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Partially Allows MSRTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation by Removing 50% Future Prospects Addition for Self-Employed Deceased. The Court held that for self-employed persons, addition towards future prospects is not permissible under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and modified the award accordingly.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) appealed against the judgment and order dated 11.04.2016 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Aurangabad in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.69/2015. The claimants, respondents 1 to 5, had sought compensation for the death of Ganesh Jagannath Thombre, who died in a vehicular accident on 01.12.2014 involving an ST bus bearing registration no. MH14BT2455. The claimants alleged that the accident was caused by the rash and negligent driving of the bus driver. The Tribunal awarded compensation, including an addition of 50% of the deceased's actual income towards future prospects. The deceased was a self-employed person. The sole issue in the appeal was whether such addition was permissible. The High Court, relying on the principle that future prospects are not to be added for self-employed persons, held that the Tribunal erred. The Court modified the award by deleting the 50% addition towards future prospects, thereby reducing the compensation amount. The appeal was partly allowed.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Future Prospects - Self-Employed Deceased - Addition of 50% towards future prospects is not permissible for self-employed persons under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The Tribunal erred in adding 50% of the actual income towards future prospects for a self-employed deceased - Held that the award must be modified to delete the addition for future prospects (Paras 2, 4-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal could add 50% of the actual income of a self-employed deceased towards future prospects while determining compensation payable to his legal representatives.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is partly allowed. The impugned judgment and award is modified by deleting the addition of 50% towards future prospects. The compensation amount is reduced accordingly.

Law Points

  • Future prospects
  • self-employed
  • compensation
  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Section 166
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (07) 61

First Appeal No. 4141 of 2016

2017-07-28

P.R. Bora

Smt Ranjana D Reddy for Appellant, Smt. Savita P. Kakade (Matkar) for Respondent Nos.1 to 5, Mr. Harish S. Bali for Respondent No.6

Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Division Office, At Aurangabad

1. Jagnnath s/o. Himmatrao Thombare, 2. Pushpabai w/o. Jagnnath Thombare, 3. Archana w/o. Ganesh Thombare, 4. Yogesh s/o Jagannath Thombare, 5. Sharavani d/o. Ganesh Thombare, 6. Jagannath S/o. Sitaram Walukar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in a claim petition for compensation due to death in vehicular accident.

Remedy Sought

Appellant MSRTC sought reduction of compensation by deleting the addition of 50% towards future prospects.

Filing Reason

The Tribunal added 50% of actual income towards future prospects for a self-employed deceased, which the appellant contended was impermissible.

Previous Decisions

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Aurangabad in M.A.C.P. No.69/2015 awarded compensation including 50% future prospects addition.

Issues

Whether addition of 50% towards future prospects is permissible for a self-employed deceased while determining compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant MSRTC argued that for self-employed persons, no addition towards future prospects should be made. Respondents-claimants supported the Tribunal's award.

Ratio Decidendi

For self-employed persons, no addition towards future prospects is permissible while computing compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Judgment Excerpts

Where deceased was a self employed person, while determining the amount of compensation payable to his legal representatives, whether an addition of 50% actual income of the said deceased could have been made by the Claims Tribunal towards his future prospects is the issue to be dealt with in the present appeal.

Procedural History

The claimants filed M.A.C.P. No.69/2015 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Aurangabad, which awarded compensation on 11.04.2016. The MSRTC appealed to the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad by filing First Appeal No. 4141 of 2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 166
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Partially Allows MSRTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation by Removing 50% Future Prospects Addition for Self-Employed Deceased. The Court held that for self-employed persons, addition towards fu...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Consent and Voluntary Relationship. Prosecutrix's Voluntary Stay and Marriage-Like Relationship with Accused Negates Offences Under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC.