Section 6 Specific Relief Act – Proof of Possession Mandatory.
5 Mar 2026This case arose from a dispute over possession of a dispensary premises in Mumbai between family members. The plaintiffs claimed that they were in set...
Search Results for "Plaint averments"
1991 result(s) found
Found 1991 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Credit Card Recovery Suit — Bank's Suit Not Barred by Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction as Part of Cause of Action Arose at Bangalore. The Court held that plaint averments regarding issuance of card, place of payment, and agreement to terms at Bangalore constitute part of cause of action under Section 20 CPC.
3 Mar 2017The appellant, Canara Bank, filed a suit in the Court of Small Causes, Bangalore, for recovery of money against the respondent, Girija Prasad Gupta, a...
- 125
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for partition and separate possession of ancestral property dismissed as plaintiff failed to prove joint family property and possession.
19 Mar 2024The appellant, Nitin Keshavlal Shah, filed a second appeal against the judgment and order dated 31/07/2023 passed by the learned District Judge-1, Lat...
- 69
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Amendment of Plaint in Eviction Suit Under Article 227 — Amendment Relating to Subsequent Events on Same Cause of Action Permissible. Amendment to incorporate details of sub-letting and permanent structure erection after filing of suit does not introduce new cause of action and is not barred by limitation under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.
22 Mar 2021The petitioners, defendants in an eviction suit, challenged the order of the Trial Court allowing amendment of the plaint and the Appellate Court's di...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute, Holding Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Suit for Declaration of Rights Under Development Agreement. The Court set aside the order returning plaint, ruling that the Slum Rehabilitation Authority's jurisdiction is limited to statutory functions and does not oust civil court's jurisdiction to adjudicate contractual disputes.
27 Jul 2010The plaintiff, Bholanath Ramjas Yadav, filed a suit in the City Civil Court, Bombay, seeking a declaration that he is entitled to the benefits of a De...
- 80
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Revision Petition in Partition Suit — Court Fee Dispute Under Section 37(2) of Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955. Held that when plaintiff seeks declaration of title and cancellation of documents, court fee is computed on the basis of the relief of partition and not on the value of the property.
6 Jan 2026The case involves a civil revision petition filed by the first defendant in a partition suit challenging the trial court's order regarding court fee. ...
- 111
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses/Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit. Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963 Evaluated.
16 Apr 2021This regular first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 challenged the judgment and decree dated 20.11.2012 passed by the Seni...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Application to Vacate Arrest Order of Vessel in Admiralty Suit. The Court Examines Alleged Suppression of Facts and Non-compliance with Caveat under Section 148A CPC.
26 Jul 2022Judgment Analysis - Auto Generated...
- 44
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Partition and Declaration. Daughter Challenges Will Dated 15.06.2001 Alleging Suspicious Circumstances and Non-Compliance with Proof Requirements Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1956.
7 Jun 2024The Regular First Appeal arose from a suit for declaration, partition, and mesne profits filed by one of the daughters of late M. Krishnappa. The dece...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree — Decree Set Aside on Condition of Costs. Ex-parte decree set aside as defendant had sufficient cause for absence and application was maintainable under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.
22 Jun 2005The appellant, original defendant No.2, suffered an ex-parte decree dated 12.11.2003 for want of filing a written statement. He filed a notice of moti...
- 70
