Madras High Court Allows Revision Petition in Partition Suit — Court Fee Dispute Under Section 37(2) of Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955. Held that when plaintiff seeks declaration of title and cancellation of documents, court fee is computed on the basis of the relief of partition and not on the value of the property.

High Court: Madras High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a civil revision petition filed by the first defendant in a partition suit challenging the trial court's order regarding court fee. The plaintiff, V.Narendran, filed O.S.No.233 of 2022 before the I Additional District and Sessions Court, Tiruppur, seeking partition of the suit property, declaration that the first defendant is not the daughter of the deceased Muthusamy, and declaration that the Release Deed dated June 14, 2013 executed by Tara Devi in favour of the first defendant and the Sale Deeds dated June 17, 2016 and March 12, 2020 executed by the first defendant and her children in favour of defendants 5 and 6 are null and void. The plaintiff claimed that the suit property was owned by Muthusamy, who executed a Will dated June 9, 1993 creating a life estate in favour of his second wife Tara Devi and vested remainder to the plaintiff and the first defendant. After Tara Devi's death, the plaintiff and first defendant became entitled to equal shares. The first defendant allegedly obtained a Legal Heirship Certificate and got a Release Deed from Tara Devi, and later sold the entire property. The plaintiff contended that Tara Devi had no right to execute the Release Deed and that the sale deeds do not bind the plaintiff. The first defendant entered appearance and filed I.A.No.1 of 2022 challenging the court fee paid by the plaintiff, arguing that the plaintiff ought to have paid court fee on the total value of the suit property as per Section 37(2) of the Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955. The trial court dismissed the application, holding that the court fee paid was sufficient. Aggrieved, the first defendant filed the present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The High Court analyzed the nature of the suit and held that the main relief is partition and the declarations regarding the documents are ancillary. Therefore, court fee is payable under Section 37(2) on the value of the plaintiff's share in the suit property. The court allowed the revision petition, set aside the trial court's order, and directed the trial court to decide the court fee issue afresh in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Court Fee - Partition Suit - Section 37(2) Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 - The plaintiff filed a suit for partition, declaration that the first defendant is not the daughter of the deceased, and declaration that the Release Deed and Sale Deeds are null and void. The first defendant contended that the court fee paid was insufficient. The court held that the plaintiff's main relief is partition and the declaration regarding documents is ancillary; hence court fee is payable under Section 37(2) on the plaintiff's share of the property. The revision petition was allowed and the trial court's order was set aside. (Paras 1-14)

B) Civil Procedure - Court Fee - Ancillary Relief - Section 37(2) Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 - When a plaintiff seeks partition and also seeks cancellation of documents, the cancellation is not a substantive relief but ancillary to partition. Therefore, court fee is computed on the value of the plaintiff's share in the suit property, not on the total value of the property. (Paras 10-14)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the court fee paid by the plaintiff in a suit for partition and declaration that certain documents are null and void is sufficient under Section 37(2) of the Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955, when the plaintiff seeks both partition and cancellation of documents.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the civil revision petition, set aside the order dated January 23, 2023 passed by the I Additional District and Sessions Court, Tiruppur in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in O.S.No.233 of 2022, and directed the trial court to decide the court fee issue afresh in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Court fee in suit for partition and declaration of title
  • Section 37(2) Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act
  • 1955
  • computation of court fee based on plaintiff's share
  • distinction between substantive and ancillary relief
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:MHC:72

CRP NO.518 OF 2023

2026-01-06

R. SAKTHIVEL

2026:MHC:72

Mr.A.Sheik Peer, Mr.Siddharth Sridhar for Mr.R.Bharath Kumar

Santhi Dhayakaran

V.Narendran

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil revision petition against order dismissing application challenging court fee in partition suit

Remedy Sought

Petitioner/first defendant sought to set aside the trial court's order dated January 23, 2023 dismissing I.A.No.1 of 2022 and to direct the plaintiff to pay proper court fee

Filing Reason

Petitioner contended that the plaintiff paid insufficient court fee on the suit for partition and declaration

Previous Decisions

Trial court dismissed I.A.No.1 of 2022 on January 23, 2023, holding that court fee paid was sufficient

Issues

Whether the court fee paid by the plaintiff in a suit for partition and declaration that certain documents are null and void is sufficient under Section 37(2) of the Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the plaintiff ought to have paid court fee on the total value of the suit property as per Section 37(2) because the plaintiff seeks cancellation of documents Respondent argued that the main relief is partition and the declarations are ancillary, so court fee is payable on the plaintiff's share

Ratio Decidendi

In a suit for partition where the plaintiff also seeks declaration that certain documents are null and void, the declaration is ancillary to the main relief of partition. Therefore, court fee is payable under Section 37(2) of the Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 on the value of the plaintiff's share in the suit property, not on the total value of the property.

Judgment Excerpts

The main relief sought in the suit is partition and the declaration regarding the documents is ancillary to the main relief. Therefore, court fee is payable under Section 37(2) of the Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 on the value of the plaintiff's share in the suit property.

Procedural History

The plaintiff filed O.S.No.233 of 2022 before the I Additional District and Sessions Court, Tiruppur. The first defendant filed I.A.No.1 of 2022 challenging the court fee. The trial court dismissed the application on January 23, 2023. The first defendant then filed CRP No.518 of 2023 under Article 227 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court, which was allowed on January 6, 2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955: 37(2)
  • Constitution of India, 1950: 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Revision Petition in Partition Suit — Court Fee Dispute Under Section 37(2) of Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955. Held that when plaintiff seeks declaration of title and cancellation of documents, court fe...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Challenge to Stamp Duty Demand on Marine-cum-Erection Policies. Policies for construction of rigs classified as Sea Insurance under Article 47A(ii) of Indian Stamp Act, 1899.