LETTER PATENT APPEAL NO. 449 OF 2004
23 Sep 2005...
Search Results for "statutory deposit"
3320 result(s) found
Found 3320 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Complainant's Revision in Cheque Bouncing Case, Restores Order Issuing Process Against Accused. Sessions Court Erred in Holding Cheque Was Given as Security Without Trial.
19 Oct 2006The complainant, M/s Travel Force, a division of M/s Hede Consultancy Co. Ltd., filed a criminal complaint against Dr. Mohan N. Bhave under Section 13...
- 52
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Payment of Enhanced Compensation Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Directs Payment Upon Furnishing Bank Guarantee Despite Pending Appeal by Acquiring Body.
14 Feb 2014The petitioners, owners of land acquired for the Neera Deoghar Project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, sought a writ of mandamus directing the S...
- 104
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Setting Aside DRT's Reference to Arbitration in Bank Recovery Suit. Debt Recovery Tribunal Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under RDDB Act, 1993, and Arbitration Clause Cannot Oust It.
8 Mar 2016The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Harvestdeal Securities Ltd. challenging an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRA...
- 135
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Setting Aside DRT's Reference to Arbitration in Bank Recovery Suit. Arbitration Clause Does Not Oust Jurisdiction of DRT Under Section 19 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.
8 Mar 2016The petitioner, Harvestdeal Securities Ltd., challenged an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 19 February 2015, which set asid...
- 125
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Power Supply Agreement Dispute — Abrupt Stoppage of Power Constitutes Breach. The Court upheld the arbitrator's award of damages and interest, finding no patent illegality under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
6 Mar 2026The appellant, OPG Power Generation Pvt. Ltd., was the supplier of electricity under a power supply agreement dated 18.04.2018 with the respondent, Sh...
- 54
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Negligence of Driver Proved, Insurance Company Liable to Pay. Deceased was a 35-year-old software engineer earning Rs. 8,000 per month; multiplier of 17 applied, future prospects considered, and consortium awarded to dependents.
10 Feb 2014The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the dependents of the deceased, K.P. Sudhakaran, who died in a road accident on 18th Aug...
- 76
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Lack of Proof of Income and Negligence. Owner of Vehicle Held Liable for Contributory Negligence as Driver Was Not Licensed, but Insurance Company Not Liable to Pay Compensation Beyond Statutory Limits.
28 Oct 2013The case involves appeals filed by the New India Assurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and award dated 18/10/2008 passed by the Motor Accident Claim...
- 44
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Subcontract Dispute. Petition filed by main contractor against subcontractor's award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
21 Mar 2013Patel Engineering Co. Ltd (PEC) challenged an arbitral award dated 25 January 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in t...
- 27
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree Despite Dismissal of Order IX Rule 13 Application — Delay Condoned Due to Pendency of Earlier Proceedings. The Court held that the statutory right of appeal under Section 96(2) CPC is not extinguished by the dismissal of an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC, and time spent in bona fide proceedings for setting aside the ex-parte decree constitutes sufficient cause for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
1 Jan 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the defendant-appellant against the order of the Madras High Court refusing to condone the delay of 546 ...
- 490
