Search Results for "statement under Section 131"

1045 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1045 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.

The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010028642011_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Commercial Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Appeal Questions the Upholding of Arbitral Award Granting Remuneration and Indemnity Under Reconstitution Deed of Partnership Firm.

The present Commercial Appeal under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 661 OF 2005

The case arose from Special Case No. 10 of 2001 before the III Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, where eight accused faced trial on charges of kidnap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Decides Challenge to Arbitral Award in Reclamation Work Contract Dispute. Petition Filed Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Seeking to Set Aside Award for Alleged Procedural Irregularities.

The petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by the Board of Trustees of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Convictions and Reverses Acquittals in Political Rivalry Murder Case — Witness Testimony and Recoveries Sufficient to Sustain Convictions Under Sections 302, 148, 460 IPC and Section 3 Explosives Substances Act.

The case arises from a political rivalry between CPI(M) and NDF members. On 17.07.2002, an altercation occurred between the deceased (CPI(M)) and A-3 ...