Search Results for "section 34"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "section 34"

604 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 604 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Unexplained Delay and Unworkability - Restores Parties to Original Positions Under Article 142. Unexplained delay of over three years in pronouncing award and failure to finally settle disputes renders award contrary to public policy under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court of India considered two civil appeals arising from an arbitral award that was reserved on 28.07.2012 but pronounced only on 16.03.20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Insurance Dispute — Floater Policy Interpretation Upheld. Court remits issue of loss assessment for reconsideration under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Oct 2015

The petitioner, M/s. Boghara Polyfab Private Limited, had obtained a Fire and Special Perils Policy from the respondent, National Insurance Company Li...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Award Rejecting Claim for Balance Payment Under Cable Laying Contract. Court Upholds Arbitrator's Findings on Deductions and Lack of Evidence, Holding No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

10 Jun 2013

The petitioner, M/s. Reunion Engineering Co. Pvt. Ltd., was awarded a contract on 23 January 2002 by the respondent, M/s. Petronet MHB Ltd., to lay ca...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Chamber Summons Seeking Dismissal of Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act — Pre-Deposit Condition Under Section 7 of Interest on Delayed Payments Act, 1993 Upheld by Supreme Court. The Supreme Court held that the term 'appeal' in Section 7 of the 1993 Act includes a Section 34 application, and directed deposit of 75% of award amount, which was complied with, so the petition is to be heard on merits.

22 Oct 2010

The respondent, Snehadeep Structures Pvt. Ltd., filed Chamber Summons No. 553 of 2010 seeking dismissal of Arbitration Petition No. 499 of 2003 filed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Petition Filed Beyond Limitation Period as Application Under Section 33 Does Not Extend Time for Challenging Award.

27 Sep 2010

The petitioner, Shri Amit Suryakant Lunavat, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Contractual Dispute — Constitution of Arbitral Tribunal Upheld Despite Appointment of Third Arbitrator by Appointing Authority. The court held that the appointment of a third arbitrator under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, without party consultation, is valid when one party fails to appoint its arbitrator, and the award on merits, including interest at 18% per annum, is not against public policy.

14 Sep 2010

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a judgment of the District Judge, Pune, which ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in LPG Dealership Dispute — Termination Upheld as Valid. Arbitrator's findings on breach of agreement clauses and quantification of damages were not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Aug 2010

The Petitioner, Ms. Anila Gautam Jain, proprietress of M/s. Badal Agency, was appointed as a dealer by the Respondent, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Development Agreement Dispute. Court upholds award of damages for delay in handing over possession and interest under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Jun 2010

The petitioner, BASF India Ltd., entered into an agreement dated 5.3.2002 with the respondent, Landcom Properties Pvt. Ltd., under which the responden...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging State Government's Revisional Order Under Urban Land Ceiling Act — State Government Exceeded Powers Under Section 34 by Reopening Concluded Proceedings After 25 Years Without Jurisdictional Error. The Court Held That Revisional Power Must Be Exercised Within a Reasonable Time and Cannot Be Used to Set Aside an Appellate Order That Had Attained Finality.

29 Jun 2010

The petitioners, heirs of the original landholder Mohamed Amin Bharmar, challenged the order dated 7th November 2007 passed by the State Government un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Revisional Order Under Urban Land Ceiling Act After Repeal Proposal. State Government retains jurisdiction under Section 34 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 until formal repeal takes effect.

6 May 2010

The petitioners, nine individuals and one through their power of attorney holder, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the decis...

51 52 53 54 55

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)