Search Results for "regularisation"

649 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 649 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Selected Candidate in Himachal Pradesh Board of School Education Recruitment Case. Power of Relaxation Under Rule 18 of R&P Rules Upheld for Candidate with Higher Qualification and Highest Merit Score Despite Lack of Prescribed Work Experience.

The present appeals arose from a recruitment process initiated by the Himachal Pradesh Board of School Education for the post of Computer Hardware Eng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Contempt Petition and Writ Petitions in Land Acquisition Dispute — No Willful Disobedience Found. Court held that the acquisition proceedings under the Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987 were valid and the petitioner failed to establish contempt.

The case involves a contempt petition (CCC No. 655/2023) filed by Chamundeshwari Nagara Sarvodaya Sangha against Sri Dinesh Kumar, Commissioner of Mys...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Absorption of Part-Time Lecturer in Service — Educational Appellate Authority's Rejection Set Aside. Continuous Service Since 1996 and Existence of Vacancy Justify Regularisation Under Karnataka Education Act, 1983.

The appellant, Smt. Vijayalakshmi H.S., was appointed as a part-time Hindi lecturer at Kamala Nehru Women's College, Shivamogga, on 01.06.1996, follow...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Refund of Court Fees in DRT Proceedings When Main Petition Becomes Infructuous — Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 13. The Debt Recovery Tribunal has inherent power to order refund of court fees under Section 13 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 when the main petition is disposed of as infructuous.

The petitioners, Sri Narayana Murthy H M and Smt. Chandrakala R., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010137632012_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes State Order Permitting Non-Forest Use of Reserved Forest Without Central Approval. Section 28 of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 Cannot Override Section 2 of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980.

The petitioner, Gireesh Achar, filed a public interest litigation under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 2...