Karnataka High Court Allows Absorption of Part-Time Lecturer in Service — Educational Appellate Authority's Rejection Set Aside. Continuous Service Since 1996 and Existence of Vacancy Justify Regularisation Under Karnataka Education Act, 1983.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Smt. Vijayalakshmi H.S., was appointed as a part-time Hindi lecturer at Kamala Nehru Women's College, Shivamogga, on 01.06.1996, following the retirement of Mr. Shankareshwar Bhat on 31.05.1996. The appointment was made by the competent body after due selection from the open market. She filed a revision petition under Section 131 of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983, seeking absorption in service, which was rejected by the Educational Appellate Authority-1st Respondent on 15.05.2013. She then filed a writ petition (W.P.No.29574/2013) before the High Court, which was dismissed by a learned Single Judge on 24.02.2016. Aggrieved, she filed the present intra-court appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act. The Division Bench, comprising Justice Krishna S Dixit and Justice Ramachandra D. Huddar, heard the matter. The appellant's counsel argued that the vacancy arose on 31.05.1996 and she was appointed on 01.06.1996 to a clear vacancy, and she had been continuously serving since then. The management (Respondents 4 and 5) supported her claim. The court found that the rejection by the Appellate Authority was unjustified, as the appointment was to a clear vacancy and the appellant had been serving continuously. The court set aside the order of the Single Judge and the Appellate Authority, and directed the respondents to absorb the appellant in service. The judgment was delivered on 12.06.2024.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Absorption - Part-Time Lecturer - Regularisation - Karnataka Education Act, 1983, Section 131 - The appellant, appointed as a part-time Hindi lecturer on 01.06.1996 after due selection, sought absorption. The Educational Appellate Authority rejected her revision petition. The High Court held that the vacancy arose on 31.05.1996, the appointment was to a clear vacancy, and the appellant had been continuously serving. The court set aside the rejection and directed absorption, noting that the management supported the claim. (Paras 1-3)

B) Service Law - Writ Appeal - Intra-Court Appeal - Karnataka High Court Act - The appeal challenged a Single Judge's order dismissing the writ petition. The Division Bench allowed the appeal, setting aside the Single Judge's order and the Appellate Authority's order, directing absorption of the appellant. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the rejection of the appellant's revision petition under Section 131 of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983, seeking absorption in service, was justified.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The order of the learned Single Judge dated 24.02.2016 in W.P.No.29574/2013 is set aside. Consequently, the order of the Educational Appellate Authority dated 15.05.2013 in Revision Petition No.16/2012 is also set aside. The respondents are directed to absorb the appellant in service.

Law Points

  • Absorption in service
  • part-time lecturer
  • regularisation
  • Karnataka Education Act 1983 Section 131
  • Educational Appellate Authority
  • writ appeal
  • intra-court appeal
  • vacancy
  • continuous service
  • selection process
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (KAR) (07) 3

WA No. 1429 of 2016 (S-RES)

2024-06-12

Justice Krishna S Dixit, Justice Ramachandra D. Huddar

Sri. Vijaya Kumar (for appellant), Sri. C.N. Mahadeswara (AGA for R1-R3), Sri. M. Narayana Bhat (for R4 & R5)

Smt. Vijayalakshmi H S

The Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Bangalore; The Commissioner, Department of Collegiate Education, Bangalore; The Regional Joint Director, Department of Collegiate Education, Bangalore; The Principal, The Kamala Nehru Memorial National College for Women, Shivamogga; The Secretary, National Education Society, Shivamogga

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Intra-court appeal against dismissal of writ petition challenging rejection of revision petition for absorption in service.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought setting aside of the Single Judge's order and the Appellate Authority's order, and direction for her absorption in service.

Filing Reason

The appellant's revision petition under Section 131 of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983, seeking absorption, was rejected by the Educational Appellate Authority.

Previous Decisions

The writ petition (W.P.No.29574/2013) was dismissed by a learned Single Judge on 24.02.2016.

Issues

Whether the rejection of the appellant's revision petition under Section 131 of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983, was justified. Whether the appellant was entitled to absorption in service given her appointment to a clear vacancy and continuous service.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the vacancy arose on 31.05.1996 and she was appointed on 01.06.1996 after due selection, and she had been continuously serving. Management (Respondents 4 and 5) supported the appellant's claim for absorption.

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant was appointed to a clear vacancy after due selection and had been continuously serving since 1996. The rejection of her revision petition was unjustified, and she is entitled to absorption in service.

Judgment Excerpts

This intra-court Appeal seeks to call in question a learned Single Judge’s order dated 24.02.2016 whereby, the Appellant’s W.P.No.29574/2013 (S-RES) has been negatived. Learned counsel appearing for the Appellant vehemently argues and that is supported by the learned counsel appearing for the Management i.e., Respondent Nos.4 & 5 that the vacancy in the post in question arose on 31.05.1996 on one Mr.Shankareshwar Bhat having demitted office on attaining the age of superannuation and to that vacancy, the Appellant came to be appointed vide order dated 01.06.1996 by the competent body of the institution as Hindi lecturer on part time basis.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a revision petition under Section 131 of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983, which was rejected by the Educational Appellate Authority on 15.05.2013. She then filed a writ petition (W.P.No.29574/2013) before the High Court, which was dismissed by a learned Single Judge on 24.02.2016. Aggrieved, she filed the present intra-court appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, which was allowed by the Division Bench on 12.06.2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Education Act, 1983: 131
  • Karnataka High Court Act: 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Sustained as Chain of Circumstances Complete and Inconsistencies in Defence Explanation Found Fa...
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Allows Absorption of Part-Time Lecturer in Service — Educational Appellate Authority's Rejection Set Aside. Continuous Service Since 1996 and Existence of Vacancy Justify Regularisation Under Karnataka Education Act, 1983.