Search Results for "last known address"

1237 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1237 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Specific Performance Dispute. Court upholds award rejecting claim for specific performance of agreement to sell immovable property, finding no grounds under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Rajesh V. Choudhary, filed Arbitration Petition No.734 of 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Pronounces on MSEDCL's Challenge to Order Permitting Single Point Supply to Condominium Under Section 127 Electricity Act. Appellate Authority Allowed Developer to Supply Electricity to Unit Holders through HT Connection Without Individual Connections.

The dispute pertains to the legality of single point electricity supply to a condominium complex known as Great Eastern Plaza in Pune. The petitioner,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Frames Charges Against Accused for Filing Frivolous Litigations; Supreme Court Dispenses with Trial in Contempt Case. Forum Shopping and Abuse of Process Held to Amount to Criminal Contempt Under Section 2(c) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The criminal contempt petition was filed by Hasham Investment and Trading Company Private Limited, Wipro Limited, and Azim Hasham Premji (complainants...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Against Politician for Alleged Disproportionate Assets — No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Petitioner failed to provide credible material to justify investigation under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The petitioner, an RTI activist, filed a PIL in the Bombay High Court alleging that respondent 9, a politician and former Home Minister of Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit by 'VOGUE' Magazine Owner Against 'JUST IN VOGUE' Retail Services. Well-Known Mark 'VOGUE' Protected Against Use for Dissimilar Services Under Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiffs, Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. and its subsidiary, are the proprietors and users of the trademark 'VOGUE' in respect of magazines a...