Search Results for "oral tenancy"

1128 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1128 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Suit for Possession Based on Title in Absence of Proof of Tenancy by Defendant. Adverse Possession Claim Fails as Possession of Tenant Becomes Adverse Only After Surrender or Denial of Title.

The case involves a dispute over possession of a property in Kolhapur. The plaintiffs, legal heirs of the original owner Ganpatrao Rashingkar, filed a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Concurrent Findings in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits. Court upholds that a tenant's daughter-in-law and granddaughter, claiming independent title, cannot resist eviction after termination of tenancy under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The case arises from a civil revision application filed by the original defendant nos. 1 and 2, Smt. Manju w/o Baldev Narang and Sapna d/o Baldev Nara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition, Quashes Trial Court Order Staying Suit Pending Tenancy Determination. Court holds that civil suit for possession based on licence must proceed on framed issues; tenancy issue arises only if plaintiff fails to prove licence.

The petitioner, Raichand Sobhagchand Shah, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 6.2.2006 passed by the trial court in Regular Civil Suit N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Property Dispute — Agreement of Transfer and Re-conveyance Clause Requires Trial. Order VII Rule 11 CPC plaint rejection set aside as suit raises triable issues regarding clause 10 of 1957 agreement and plaintiff's transferee rights.

The appellant, Satish Talakchand Shah, filed a civil suit (Civil Suit No. 1708 of 2010) in the City Civil Court, Mumbai, seeking declaration of owners...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Property Dispute — Suit Barred by Limitation Under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC. Clause 10 of Agreement for Sale Dated 31-03-1957 Was a Right of Re-Conveyance, Not a Contract for Sale, and Cause of Action Arose in 1988.

The appellant, Kishorbhai Premchand Shah, filed a civil suit in the City Civil Court, Mumbai, seeking a declaration of ownership and permanent injunct...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act for Possession Based on Prior Possession. The court held that the appellant had established prior possession and dispossession without consent, entitling her to a decree for possession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, Cian De Souza, filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking vacation and peaceful possession of Flat No.4, Ha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlords' Second Ejectment Suit as Barred by Order 22 Rule 9 CPC. Abatement of First Suit Exhausts Rent Controller's Permission and Prevents Fresh Suit Without Fresh Permission.

The case involves a dispute between landlords (appellants) and tenants (respondents) over a suit for ejectment and possession. The original landlord, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Permanent Injunction Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Possession and Ownership Based on Revenue Records and Prior Adjudication. Tenancy Claim and Agreement of Sale Rejected as Not Proved and Inconsistent with Earlier Proceedings.

The case pertains to a Second Appeal filed by the original defendants (appellants) against the judgment and order dated 7.4.2007 passed by the Princip...