Search Results for "confirmation order"

2356 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2356 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence in Kidnapping, Rape, and Murder of Minor Girl - Accused's Appeal Dismissed. Circumstantial evidence including last seen theory and medical evidence held sufficient to sustain conviction under Sections 364, 366, 376, 377, 302, 201 IPC.

The case pertains to the kidnapping, rape, and murder of an 11-year-old girl named Bhagyashree on 10.11.2004. The accused, Arjun Laxman Jogadiya alias...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Reference for Confirmation of Death Sentence and Appeal in Triple Murder Case. Analysis Focuses on Whether Circumstantial Evidence Sufficiently Established Accused's Guilt Under Section 302 IPC.

This matter originated with the discovery of three dead bodies of minor children near a railway track at Kalyan Patri Pool on 1 March 2001. Police Ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interim Application Seeking Ratification of Sale Under Section 536(2) of Companies Act, 1956 — Court Ratifies Sale of Property by Company in Liquidation to Bona Fide Purchaser for Value Without Notice of Winding Up Petition.

The Bombay High Court allowed an interim application filed by the applicant seeking a declaration that the sale agreement dated 5th September 2007 was...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court examines blocking of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A of CGST Rules. Petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenge orders blocking electronic credit ledger without hearing, contending violation of natural justice and fundamental rights.

The writ petitions were filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, by several pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Sentence Modification in Court-Martial Case. General Court Martial Composition Violated Army Rules, 1954, Rule 40(2) and Rule 102, but Armed Forces Tribunal's Sentencing Discretion Under Section 71(e) of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 Upheld.

The dispute arose from disciplinary proceedings against a retired Lieutenant General of the Indian Army, initiated after an anonymous complaint in 200...