Bombay High Court Allows Interim Application Seeking Ratification of Sale Under Section 536(2) of Companies Act, 1956 — Court Ratifies Sale of Property by Company in Liquidation to Bona Fide Purchaser for Value Without Notice of Winding Up Petition.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 593
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Bombay High Court allowed an interim application filed by the applicant seeking a declaration that the sale agreement dated 5th September 2007 was not affected by Section 536(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, and for ratification of the sale. The background facts involve a company (Respondent No.1) that was wound up by order dated 26th July 2010. The applicant had purchased leasehold rights and structures on land from the company by a registered sale agreement dated 5th September 2007 for a consideration of Rs.1,25,00,000/-, which was fully paid. The applicant claimed it had no knowledge of the winding up petition filed on 25th August 2003 or the admission order dated 4th February 2005 until 2011 when the Official Liquidator sought to take possession. The applicant had also invested substantial sums in the property and mortgaged it to a bank. The court noted that under Section 536(2), any disposition of property after the commencement of winding up is void unless the court orders otherwise. The winding up order relates back to the date of presentation of the petition under Section 441. However, the court has discretion to validate such dispositions if they are made bona fide and for the benefit of the company. The court found that the applicant was a bona fide purchaser for value without notice of the winding up proceedings, had paid the full consideration, and had made substantial investments. The court also noted that the company's secured creditor, Bank of Baroda, had issued a no dues certificate in 2007, and the applicant had settled the dues of the petitioning creditor. The court held that it was a fit case to exercise discretion under Section 536(2) and ratified the sale agreement, declaring it valid and binding. The court directed the Official Liquidator not to disturb the applicant's possession and to execute necessary documents to transfer the property in favour of the applicant.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Winding Up - Section 536(2) Companies Act, 1956 - Disposition of Property After Commencement of Winding Up - The court considered whether a sale agreement executed after the date of presentation of the winding up petition but before the winding up order is void under Section 536(2). The court held that such dispositions are not void ab initio but voidable, and the court has discretion to validate them if made bona fide and for the benefit of the company. (Paras 1-20)

B) Company Law - Winding Up - Section 441 Companies Act, 1956 - Doctrine of Relation Back - The court examined the principle that a winding up order relates back to the date of presentation of the petition. However, the court held that this doctrine does not automatically invalidate transactions entered into during the pendency of the petition if the court exercises its discretion to ratify them under Section 536(2). (Paras 15-18)

C) Company Law - Bona Fide Purchaser - Ratification of Sale - The court considered the position of a purchaser who acted in good faith, paid full consideration, and had no notice of the winding up petition. The court held that such a purchaser is entitled to protection and the court may ratify the sale to avoid injustice. (Paras 10-14)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the sale agreement dated 5th September 2007 entered into by the company in liquidation is void under Section 536(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, and whether the court should ratify the sale in favour of the applicant who was a bona fide purchaser for value without notice of the winding up petition.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the interim application, declared that the sale agreement dated 5th September 2007 is not affected by Section 536(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, and ratified the sale. The court directed the Official Liquidator not to disturb the applicant's possession and to execute necessary documents to transfer the property in favour of the applicant.

Law Points

  • Section 536(2) Companies Act
  • 1956
  • Section 441 Companies Act
  • Doctrine of Relation Back
  • Bona Fide Purchaser for Value Without Notice
  • Ratification of Sale by Court
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 Lawtext (BOM) (6) 103

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1454 OF 2024 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 924 OF 2003

2024-06-10

ABHAY AHUJA, J

Mr. Sarosh Bharucha with Mr. Hrushi Narvekar and Mr.K.V Ramdasan i/b E. A. Sasi & Mr. Arnav Rane, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Ranjeev Carvalho, Advocate for Official Liquidator. Mr. Chetan Shelake, Assistant Official Liquidator.

Helbon Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Anr.

Ferral Anant Machinery Manufacturers Pvt. Ltd. Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Interim application in a winding up petition seeking declaration that sale agreement is not affected by Section 536(2) of Companies Act, 1956 and for ratification of the sale.

Remedy Sought

Applicant sought a declaration that the sale agreement dated 5th September 2007 is valid and not void under Section 536(2), and for ratification of the sale.

Filing Reason

The applicant purchased property from a company that was subsequently wound up; the Official Liquidator sought to take possession, prompting the applicant to seek validation of the sale.

Previous Decisions

Winding up petition was admitted on 4th February 2005; winding up order passed on 26th July 2010. Applicant filed Company Application No.325 of 2011 which was withdrawn with liberty to file fresh proceedings.

Issues

Whether the sale agreement dated 5th September 2007 is void under Section 536(2) of the Companies Act, 1956? Whether the court should ratify the sale in favour of the applicant who was a bona fide purchaser for value without notice?

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant submitted that it was a bona fide purchaser for value without notice of the winding up petition, paid full consideration, and invested substantial sums; the sale should be ratified. Official Liquidator submitted that the disposition is void under Section 536(2) as it occurred after the presentation of the winding up petition, and the doctrine of relation back applies.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 536(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, any disposition of property after the commencement of winding up is void unless the court orders otherwise. The court has discretion to validate such dispositions if they are made bona fide and for the benefit of the company. A purchaser who acts in good faith, pays full consideration, and has no notice of the winding up petition is entitled to protection, and the court may ratify the sale to avoid injustice.

Judgment Excerpts

This Interim Application has been filed on behalf of the Applicant seeking various reliefs inter alia for a declaration that the sale agreement dated 5th September, 2007 is not affected by Section 536 (2) of the Companies Act, 1956 and to ratify the said sale. On 26th July 2010, order was passed by this Court winding up the company. The Applicant came to know of the winding up related proceedings only in the year 2011, when on 25th June 2011, a representative from the office of the Official Liquidator visited the said property and informed the Applicant that the Official Liquidator would be taking over possession of the said property in the light of the winding up order.

Procedural History

Winding up petition filed on 25th August 2003; admitted on 4th February 2005. Sale agreement executed on 5th September 2007. Winding up order passed on 26th July 2010. Applicant filed Company Application No.325 of 2011 in 2011, which was withdrawn on 13th October 2011 with liberty to file fresh proceedings. The present interim application was then filed.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 1956: 536(2), 441, 529, 529A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition in Leave and Licence Dispute — Directs Payment of Licence Fees at Contractual Rate with 7.5% Annual Escalation. The court modified the trial court's order under Order XV-A CPC to include escalation and ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Medical Student Transfer on Compassionate Grounds Despite Quota Restriction — Vestibular Neuritis Constitutes Exceptional Circumstance Under MCI Regulations. The court held that a quota restriction in an information brochur...