Search Results for "Transfer Petitions"

2122 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2122 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Slum Land Acquisition and Letter of Intent. Court Holds Petitioner's Ownership Interest Sufficient for Locus Standi but Upholds State Action Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

The case involved two writ petitions filed in 1999 and 2000 under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a land acquisition notification dated 6-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Amalgamated Company Must File Return for Pre-Amalgamation Period. Section 153A Notice Validly Issued to Transferor Company Despite Amalgamation, and Failure to File Return Attracts Penalty Under Section 276CC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) against the order of the Delhi High Court, which had ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Licensee's Challenge to Arrears Demand and License Lapse in Bombay Prohibition Act Case. Demand for License Fee Arrears for Period Prior to License Grant Held Unenforceable and License Cannot Lapse Without Notice.

The petitioner, Suresh Krishnaji Lakudkar, held a CLIII license under the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949, for the sale of foreign liquor. In Writ Petiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Rent Controller's Permission to Evict Tenant for Arrears of Rent but Rejects Habitual Defaulter Ground. Landlord's claim for habitual default fails due to lack of specific pleading and proof under clause 13(3)(ii) of C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949.

The case involves two writ petitions arising from proceedings under the C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949. The landlord, Ganesh Tukaram Lonkar, so...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Reappointment of District Forum Presidents Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Section 10(2) of the Act Prescribes a Single Term of Five Years or Until Age 65, Barring Reappointment.

The judgment addresses a common question arising in multiple writ petitions: whether the President of a District Forum constituted under Section 10 of...