Search Results for "Labour Inspector"

640 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 640 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Resumption Orders — Upholds Rights of Allottees Under Grow More Food Scheme. Collector's Order Confirming Resumption of Land After 24 Years Set Aside as Arbitrary and Violative of Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioners, legal heirs of Vithoba Dhaktode, challenged the order dated 12.05.2015 passed by the Collector, Jalna, confirming the order dated 13....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Age Below 18 Years and Relied on Contradictory Testimony.

The appellant, Asif s/o Jakir Pathan, was convicted by the Special Judge/Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Special Case (POCSO) No.173 of 2016 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cross FIRs Between Two Groups of Advocates Over Incident at Police Station. Both FIRs Found Vague and Amounting to Abuse of Process of Law Under Section 482 CrPC.

The case involves two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of two cross FIRs regist...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Double Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder of mother and brother set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Gopal Shivram Krishnan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sewree, Mumbai, for the murder of his mother and brother under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 4, 5(m) and (n) read with Section 6 of POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shaikh Anees, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO Act), Aurangabad, for offences under Sections 4, 5(m) and (n) read with Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 147, 148, 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves four criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No. 278 of 2016, con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness and Inconsistent Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nivrutti Ninaji Ghule, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon, for the murder of his niece-in-law, Sharda, under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Detention Under MPDA Act — In-Camera Statements Verified by Authorized Officer Sufficient. Detention order under Section 3(2) of MPDA Act upheld as statements of confidential witnesses were verified by Assistant Commissioner of Police and found genuine.

The petitioner, Rohit @ Karan s/o Purshottam Naukariya, was detained by an order dated 22/12/2021 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur City (r...