Bombay High Court Quashes Cross FIRs Between Two Groups of Advocates Over Incident at Police Station. Both FIRs Found Vague and Amounting to Abuse of Process of Law Under Section 482 CrPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of two cross FIRs registered on 28.05.2022 at Police Station Arni, District Yavatmal. The applicants in Criminal Application No. 857 of 2022 are Durgadas Dhansing Rathod and others, while the applicants in Criminal Application No. 1122 of 2022 are Shankar Sitaram Rathod and others. Both FIRs arise out of the same incident that occurred at the police station. The court noted that the allegations in both FIRs were vague and lacked specific details regarding the role of each accused. The court observed that continuing with such proceedings would amount to an abuse of the process of law. Accordingly, the court allowed both applications and quashed the FIRs and all consequential proceedings. The court directed that if any of the applicants are in custody, they be released forthwith.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Cross FIRs - The court considered whether cross FIRs registered for the same incident can be quashed. Held that while registration of cross FIRs is permissible, the FIRs in question were based on vague allegations and lacked specific details, making them an abuse of the process of law. The court quashed both FIRs to prevent multiplicity of proceedings and harassment of the parties. (Paras 1-10)

B) Criminal Procedure Code - Abuse of Process - Section 482 CrPC - Vague Allegations - The court examined the contents of both FIRs and found that they contained omnibus allegations without specific overt acts attributed to each accused. Held that such vague FIRs cannot be allowed to continue as they would lead to unnecessary trial and harassment. The court exercised its inherent powers to quash the proceedings. (Paras 5-9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the cross FIRs registered against each other by two groups of advocates for the same incident at a police station should be quashed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both criminal applications are allowed. FIR Nos. 486 of 2022 and 487 of 2022 registered at Police Station Arni, Distt. Yavatmal, and all consequential proceedings, are quashed and set aside. If any of the applicants are in custody, they be released forthwith.

Law Points

  • Cross FIRs permissible for same incident
  • Quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC
  • Abuse of process of law
  • Vague allegations
  • Criminal proceedings quashed
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (08) 135

Criminal Application No. 857 of 2022 with Criminal Application No. 1122 of 2022

2022-08-20

Manish Pitale, G. A. Sanap

Shri S. G. Varshani, Shri Firdos Mirza, Shri M. J. Khan

Durgadas Dhansing Rathod and others (in Criminal Application No. 857 of 2022); Shankar Sitaram Rathod and others (in Criminal Application No. 1122 of 2022)

State of Maharashtra and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal applications for quashing of FIRs under Section 482 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR Nos. 486 of 2022 and 487 of 2022 registered at Police Station Arni, Distt. Yavatmal

Filing Reason

The applicants alleged that the FIRs were based on vague allegations and were an abuse of the process of law

Issues

Whether the cross FIRs registered for the same incident should be quashed under Section 482 CrPC

Submissions/Arguments

The applicants argued that the FIRs contained vague allegations and lacked specific details, making them liable to be quashed. The non-applicants opposed the applications, but the court found merit in the applicants' submissions.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that where FIRs are based on vague allegations and continuing proceedings would amount to an abuse of the process of law, the inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC can be invoked to quash such FIRs to prevent harassment and multiplicity of proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

These applications are filed for quashing of First Information Report Nos. 486 of 2022 and 487 of 2022, both dated 28.05.2022, registered at Police Station Arni, Distt. Yavatmal. The court found that the allegations in both FIRs were vague and lacked specific details regarding the role of each accused. Continuing with such proceedings would amount to an abuse of the process of law.

Procedural History

The applicants filed criminal applications under Section 482 CrPC before the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur seeking quashing of two cross FIRs registered on 28.05.2022. The court heard both applications together and delivered a common oral judgment on 20.08.2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Cross FIRs Between Two Groups of Advocates Over Incident at Police Station. Both FIRs Found Vague and Amounting to Abuse of Process of Law Under Section 482 CrPC.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Invalidation of Caste Certificate for Vanjari NT(D) Category Student. Court sets aside Scrutiny Committee order due to lack of proper opportunity of hearing and failure to consider documentary eviden...