Search Results for "Joint Commissioner approval"

1056 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1056 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Deplorable Road Conditions and Pothole Deaths in Mumbai. Court Holds Right to Well-Maintained Roads as Fundamental Right Under Article 21 and Issues Mandatory Directions to Authorities.

This suo motu public interest litigation was registered by the Bombay High Court in 2013 based on a letter from Justice G.S. Patel highlighting the pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows TDR Claim for Amenity Development Under Appendix 'W' of Thane Municipal Corporation Development Regulations. Petitioner entitled to Transferable Development Rights for developing amenity space on surrendered plot under Clause 6 of Appendix 'W'.

The petitioner, M/s. Cosmos Realtors Joint Venture, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Apartment Construction in Residential Zone. Petitioners failed to prove zoning violation or need for environmental clearance; BBMP's approval upheld.

The petitioners, Sri. V. Dhamodaran and others, residents of Kaikondarahalli, Bangalore, filed writ petitions challenging the construction of an apart...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Caste Validity Certificates — Employer Lacks Locus Standi Under Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act, 2000. Corporation Cannot Challenge Certificates Issued to Employees as Only Person Aggrieved or State Government Can Do So.

The Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC) filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the caste validity certificates issue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Uttar Pradesh Gangsters Act Case Due to Procedural Irregularities in Gang Chart Preparation. FIR Registered Under Section 3(1) of UP Gangsters Act, 1986 Set Aside as Gang Chart Lacked Mandatory Signatures and Recommendations Required Under Section 5 and 2021 Rules.

The Supreme Court heard criminal appeals against High Court orders declining to quash an FIR registered under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Soc...