Search Results for "Constructed Property Ownership"

1099 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1099 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Reverses Acquittal. Complainant Established Ingredients Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; Accused Failed to Discharge Reverse Burden Under Section 139.

The appellant, Suresh Nakra, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) against the respondent, Murugesan Ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Landlord-Tenant Dispute Over Eviction and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Subletting and Unauthorized Construction Upheld Under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants (tenants) against the concurrent decrees of eviction and mesne profits passed by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forest Department's Notice on Private Forest Land. Held that lands restored under Section 22A of Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 retain status of reserved forest under Indian Forest Act, 1927.

The Petitioner, Sinhagad Technical Education Society, claimed ownership of lands bearing Gat Nos. 310 and 311 at village Kusgaon Budruk, Taluka Maval,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Appeals by Acquiring Authority in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute. The Court examines the correctness of enhanced compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for land acquired under the MRTP Act.

The appeals before the Bombay High Court arose from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with the Maharashtra Region...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Block Assessment Case — Unexplained Investments Not Proven as Income. The court held that the Assessing Officer failed to establish that the cash credits and investments belonged to the assessee, and the ITAT correctly deleted the additions.

The case involves appeals by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal...